Wiktionary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For information on linking to Wiktionary, see Wikipedia templates about Wiktionary.
Wiktionary
Detail of the English Wiktionary main page. All major wiktionaries are listed by number of articles.
URL http://www.wiktionary.org/
Type of site Online dictionary
Registration Optional
Available language(s): Multi-lingual (over 150)
Owner Wikimedia Foundation
Created by Jimmy Wales and the Wikimedia community

Wiktionary (from wiki and dictionary) is a multilingual, Web-based project to create a free content dictionary, available in over 150 languages. Unlike standard dictionaries, it is written collaboratively by volunteers using wiki software, allowing articles to be changed by almost anyone with access to the Web site. Like its sister project Wikipedia, Wiktionary is run by the Wikimedia Foundation. Because Wiktionary is not limited by print space considerations, most of Wiktionary's language editions provide definitions and translations of words from many languages, and some editions offer additional information typically found in thesauruses and lexicons.

Contents

[edit] Mission

Additionally, the English Wiktionary now includes Wikisaurus, a category that serves as a thesaurus, including lists of slang words.[1]

[edit] History and development

The former Wiktionary logo.
The former Wiktionary logo.

Wiktionary was brought online on December 12, 2002 following a proposal by Daniel Alston. On March 29, 2004 the first non-English Wiktionaries were initiated in French and Polish. Wiktionaries in numerous other languages have since been started. Wiktionary was hosted on a temporary URL (wiktionary.wikipedia.org) until May 1, 2004 when it switched to the current full URL.[2] As of November 2006, Wiktionary features over 1.5 million entries across its 171 language editions. The largest of the language editions is the English Wiktionary, with over 300,000 entries. It was surpassed in early 2006 by the French Wiktionary, only to regain the top position in September 2006. Eight Wiktionary language editions now contain over 100,000 entries.

Despite Wiktionary's large number of entries, most of the entries at the project's largest language editions were created by bots that found creative ways to generate entries or (rarely) automatically imported thousands of entries from previously-published dictionaries. Seven of the 18 bots registered at the English Wiktionary[3] created 163,000 of the entries there.[4] Only 259 of the entries on Wiktionary were imported automatically by Websterbot from public domain sources. Another one of these bots, "ThirdPersBot," was responsible for the addition of a number of third-person conjugations that would not receive their own entries in standard dictionaries; for instance, it defined "smoulders" as the "third-person singular simple present form of smoulder." Excluding these 163,000 entries, the English Wiktionary would have about 137,000 entries, including terms unique to languages other than English, making it smaller than most monolingual print dictionaries. The Oxford English Dictionary, for instance, has 615,000 headwords, while Merriam-Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged has 475,000 entries (with many additional embedded headwords).

The use of bots to generate large numbers of articles is visible as "growth spurts" in this graph of article counts at the largest eight Wiktionary editions; data from 30 November 2006.
The use of bots to generate large numbers of articles is visible as "growth spurts" in this graph of article counts at the largest eight Wiktionary editions; data from 30 November 2006.

The English Wiktionary, however, does not rely on bots to the extent that somewhat smaller editions do. The French and Vietnamese Wiktionaries, for example, imported large sections of the Free Vietnamese Dictionary Project (FVDP), which provides free content bilingual dictionaries to and from Vietnamese.[5] These imported entries make up virtually all of the Vietnamese edition's offering. Like the English edition, the French Wiktionary has imported the approximately 20,000 entries in the Unihan database of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean characters. The French Wiktionary grew rapidly in 2006 thanks in large part to bots copying many entries from old, freely-licensed dictionaries, such as the eighth edition of the Dictionnaire de l'Académie française (1935, around 35,000 words), and using bots to add words from other Wiktionary editions with French translations. The Russian edition grew by nearly 80,000 entries as "LXbot" added boilerplate entries (with headings, but without definitions) for words in English and German.[6]

[edit] Critical reception

Critical reception of Wiktionary has been mixed. Jill Lepore wrote in the article "Noah’s Mark" for the New Yorker, (November 6, 2006)

There’s no show of hands at Wiktionary. There’s not even an editorial staff. "Be your own lexicographer!" might be Wiktionary’s motto. Who needs experts? Why pay good money for a dictionary written by lexicographers when we can cobble one together ourselves? Wiktionary isn’t so much republican or democratic as Maoist. And it’s only as good as the copyright-expired books from which it pilfers. If you look up the word "Webster" in the Wiktionary, you will be redirected to this handy tip:

Noah Webster’s New International Dictionary of the English Language, 1911 (published by Merriam-Webster, Springfield, MA) is a public domain dictionary, as is a 1913 edition, that can be used to empower Wiktionary with more definitions.

Pfui. But, hey, at least they got his first name right.

Keir Graff’s review for Booklist was more neutral:

Is there a place for Wiktionary? Undoubtedly. The industry and enthusiasm of its many creators are proof that there’s a market. And it’s wonderful to have another strong source to use when searching the odd terms that pop up in today’s fast-changing world and the online environment. But as with so many Web sources (including this column), it’s best used by sophisticated users in conjunction with more reputable sources.

References in other publications are fleeting and part of larger discussions of Wikipedia, not progressing beyond a definition, although David Brooks in The Telegraph described it as wild and woolly.[7] (Wooly is defined as "confused" and "unrestrained.") In 2005, PC Magazine rated Wiktionary as one of the Internet's "Top 101 Web Sites,"[8] although little information was given about the site.

[edit] Wiktionary statistics

Ten largest Wiktionary language editions[9]
No. Language Language (local) Wiki Entries Total Edits Admins Users Images Updated
1 English English en 316092 431798 1807027 47 27281 133 2007-01-01 00:11:41
2 French Français fr 221871 253681 1730142 13 2801 17 2007-01-01 00:11:41
3 Vietnamese Tiếng Việt vi 208784 213284 435400 3 583 10 2007-01-01 00:13:21
4 Russian Русский ru 102134 116113 285790 2 507 94 2007-01-01 00:12:53
5 Ido Ido io 97752 135071 373217 1 91 3 2007-01-01 00:11:53
6 Chinese 中文 zh 91425 106973 386851 6 1956 108 2007-01-01 00:11:58
7 Greek Ελληνικά el 76645 87359 222370 4 221 16 2007-01-01 00:12:50
8 Turkish Türkçe tr 68002 74165 108278 6 926 48 2007-01-01 00:13:12
9 Polish Polski pl 52616 93944 327683 12 1174 107 2007-01-01 00:11:52
10 Italian Italiano it 46171 53931 195444 9 1147 105 2007-01-01 00:11:52

[edit] Comparison to sister projects

One difference between Wiktionary and Wikipedia is that pages beginning with upper- and lowercase letters can refer to different things. For example, the entries on lowercase "i" and uppercase "I" are distinct. All of the existing entries in the English Wiktionary were converted to lowercase automatically in mid-2005; manual intervention was used to move pages to uppercase (or split entries) as necessary. Links from Wikipedia to Wiktionary must be made with care, as it may be relevant to link to a lowercase entry, link to an uppercase entry, link to an entry with diacritics or link to multiple entries.

[edit] Competition

Unlike Wikipedia, Wiktionary has many competitors who offer more comprehensive works online, free of charge. Many users also prefer to post definitions on Wikipedia, instead of Wiktionary. Although encyclopedia articles customarily begin with a definition, short articles at Wikipedia that contain only definitions would be classified as "stubs". Indeed, many are unaware of the difference between a dictionary and an encyclopedia. This distinction is blurred by the existence of many encyclopedic dictionaries, reference works with a mixture of shorter dictionary entries and longer, more in-depth entries. In some reference works, such as the Enciclopedia Universal Larousse, larger articles are also organized as long dictionary entries. On the other hand, a large work with mostly in-depth prose treatises may be called a "dictionary": the 29-volume Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, for instance, contains relatively few dictionary-length entries.

[edit] References

  1. ^ See "Creating a Wikisaurus entry" for information on the structure of Wikisaurus entries. An example of a well-formatted entry would be "Wikisaurus:insane".
  2. ^ Wiktionary's current URL is www.wiktionary.org.
  3. ^ The user list at the English Wiktionary identifies accounts that have been given "bot status".
  4. ^ TheDaveBot, TheCheatBot, Websterbot, PastBot, NanshuBot
  5. ^ Hồ Ngọc Đức, Free Vietnamese Dictionary Project. Details at the Vietnamese Wiktionary.
  6. ^ LXbot
  7. ^ David Brooks, "Online, interactive encyclopedia not just for geeks anymore," The Telegraph (August 4, 2004)
  8. ^ Wiktionary. Top 101 Web Sites. PC Magazine (2005-04-06). Retrieved on 2005-12-16.
  9. ^ List of Wiktionary editions, ranked by article count.

[edit] External links

Look up Wiktionary in
Wiktionary, the free dictionary.