Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-11-14/Article evaluations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About User:Kosebamse/Twenty-random-pages test. It appears that he has older tested pages... perhaps an evaluation on these pages might be in order? Sort of like a before/after evaluation. I do agree that some of our content is pretty terrible. I should know: I've written some of it. The problem, of course, is that if you focus on an article (like I tend to do) then all other articles don't get edited. For instance, MDAC and Windows 2000 took me a long time to write because they were pretty technical. Exploding whale, on the other hand, did not because it wasn't technical and because (suprisingly) there is quite a bit of information on this that's very accessible.

Bottom line: research is hard. Writing articles is hard. I love every moment of it! - Ta bu shi da yu 07:06, 15 November 2005 (UTC)