Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/Userboxes/Arrowman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikipediaWikiProject Scouting/Userboxes/Arrowman is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

NA

This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the quality scale.

Contents 1 Image 2 Unstable 3 Image testing 4 Sandbox for OA Userbox

[edit] Image

I liked it better with the "WWW," but it's not a big deal. --Myles Long/cDc 17:03, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unstable

The images in this are way too unstable for me. The tag Nazis are always watching it, so I'm removing it from my page.Rlevse 21:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

• Protecting Wikipedia against copyright lawsuits is not being a tag nazi. Further comments by me may be found here, from your talk page. As an Eagle Scout I am sure you understand the importance of doing the right thing. --Durin 14:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Of course, but all the editing this userbox's image is making me nauseous and highly frustrated.Rlevse 15:37, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image testing

The light/dark red letters make it hard to read the "OA". I honestly don't like it. Thanks for trying. It is appreciated.Rlevse 15:37, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• I think it's better than "www" which is irrelevant to OA. --Durin 16:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Now on that one, I have to disagree. WWW has an important and specific meaning within the OA.17:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Yes, WWW is of the utmost importance to the OA, which is why I suggested that to begin with. --Myles Long 17:11, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
      • Ok, *shrug* lost me on that one. It's not my template; I was just trying to help. I think most people outside of OA would have no clue of the relevance of "WWW" to OA. Remove the image I put in from the template if you like. Just let me know if you do, so I can delete the image (as it's not going to be used anywhere else). --Durin 17:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Actually, the current image is not bad, however, WWW would be OK, too. "OA" would be another alternative. As for the changing, I don't really mind. That's the wiki way. Eventually, we will probably have convergence on a consensus, or if not, we will find a way to "split the difference" and make everybody happy - like providing two versions. Since userboxes are mostly tangential to what is really happening here, I say that it's just great for people to have fun and look for improvements. NThurston 19:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sandbox for OA Userbox

• I recommend that we use this area to try out new ideas, vote for ones you like, etc. It seems much more effective/appropriate than constantly fiddling with the actual template. Here are a few of the recent versions:NThurston 19:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

OA Sandbox This user is a member of the Order of the Arrow. WWW This user is a member of the Order of the Arrow. OA This user is a member of the Order of the Arrow. This user is a member of the Order of the Arrow. WWW This user is a member of the Order of the Arrow. OA WWW This user is a member of the Order of the Arrow. OA This user is a member of the Order of the Arrow. OA This user is a member of the Order of the Arrow. OA This user is a member of the Order of the Arrow. WWW

• Sorry to say so, but I don't like any of these and I'm also afraid I have no better idea. Rlevse 00:56, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Seeing as the WWW design got a lot of support in the above comments, I tweaked the one here a bit and came up with a slightly different design which I've added to the bottom of the sandbox. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• I like Thesquire's change, especially to white letters on red background. I'm adding a "split-the-difference" option for discussion purposes. NThurston 15:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Here's my swing at a Template design, lemme know what y'all think. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mobius (talk • contribs) 13:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't like it - there's no color differentiation between the box on the left and the text box. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 00:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Not my favorite either. Even adding a red line to divide the two boxes doesn't help. --NThurston 16:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)