Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Reenactment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've created this project as I felt the amount of articles on reenactment was a bit lacking and the articles unproportionally americanocentric. Right now I seem to be the only person interested in writing about reenactment, but since we already have articles on experimental archaeology and similar obscurities, maybe there is some hope. Maybe this should be extended to include LARP as sometimes the borders are nearly non-existant (a typical criticism regarding SCA member groups). I fear that might corrupt the focus a bit, tho, so I left that uncovered for now (Dungeons and Dragons isn't exactly on-topic when it comes to historical reenactment).
I hope nobody smites me for creating and listing a stub template before reading the rules for categorized stubs, but I didn't want to go on a spree and create stubs for all the topics that are currently missing (besides, any list I could come up with is all but exhaustive, my knowledge is pretty much limited to English and German medieval reenactment). --Ashmodai 13:41, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Nevermind the stub template, that seems to have been dealt with. Oopsie. --Ashmodai 06:15, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-
- Good idea all. I see this hasnt been updated in over a year, I will try and kickstart it with a few article cleanups :P user:Pzg Ratzinger
Contents |
[edit] Civil war
Just a quick note while I remember: we've got an awful lot of articles referring to the 'Civil War'. Most of them I can figure out whether they refer to the English Civil War, the American Civil War, or something else from List of civil wars, but it might be worth remembering to specify when we create new articles. Ojw 00:29, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Indeed. So far I've mostly been referring to the American Civil War, because that's what most articles about reenactment seem to focus on. English Civil War, World War 2 and Napoleonic reenactment are mostly uncovered so far. -- Ashmodai 10:07, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- I'd favour clear stating which civil war you're talking about somewhere near the beginning of any new article, any references after that can be assumed to be the same, unless explicitly stated otherwise --Hikari 20:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Project Directory
Hello. The WikiProject Council is currently in the process of developing a master directory of the existing WikiProjects to replace and update the existing Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. These WikiProjects are of vital importance in helping wikipedia achieve its goal of becoming truly encyclopedic. Please review the following pages:
- User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory,
- User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory 2,
- User:Badbilltucker/Philosophy and religion Directory,
- User:Badbilltucker/Sports Directory,
- User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory,
- User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory/United States, (note: This page will be retitled to more accurately reflect its contents)
- User:Badbilltucker/History and society directory, and
- User:Badbilltucker/Science directory
and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope to have the existing directory replaced by the updated and corrected version of the directory above by November 1. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 21:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry if you tried to update it before, and the corrections were gone. I have now put the new draft in the old directory pages, so the links should work better. My apologies for any confusion this may have caused you. B2T2 00:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Day Awards
Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 16:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
This article needs help!
“Reenacting began during the 1961-1965 Civil War centennial commemorations”
It’s more accurate to say that modern, authentic reenacting has its origins from then. In fact, the Civil War was reenacted before 1961 by elements of the U.S. Army as field exercises and demonstrations.
“To date the largest Civil War reenactment was 125th. Gettysburg (1988), which had over 25,000 reenactors and over 150,000 spectators attending.”
I was there. I recall 10,400 participants. Don’t know how many spectators. And I think a subsequent event was bigger, but by then I was burning out fast and stopped paying attention. At any rate, a citation is needed for this statement.
“Some people are interested in reenacting other historical events, such as Revolutionary War battles, but Civil War reenactment is by far the most popular activity in this area”
In what area? A more general statement like, “…Civil War reenacting continues to be the most widely attended form of historical reenacting in the Washington D.C. region, due, probably, to the many historical sites in the area.”
“Some reenactors, however, will tell you that the term Farb means "Far Be it for me to question his impression."”
This is a widely-held myth as to the origin of this word. It was popularized by George Gorman. See http://wesclark.com/jw/forigin.html for the correct word origin.
“A common derogatory term for such a reenactor is a "Button-Pisser," due to the fact some will soak the buttons in boiling urine to get the "accurate" luster.”
I suggest this be deleted entirely. This is a reference to a 1994 Wall Street Journal article by Tony Horwitz about hardcores. I suspect that it’s more of a reference to a published story than a description of common hardcore practice. WSJ article: http://wesclark.com/jw/hodge.html
Jonah Begone
-
- Sorry, I'm lost, which article is this (that needs the help), Jonah? Salvianus 22:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Historical re-enactment Categorisation as Live-action role-playing games
Would this be an appropriate place to ask if anyone else agrees that Historical re-enactment should not be categorised under Live-action role-playing games? I'm sure there might be a case for arguing they are related in some way, as I understand that the SCA has an authentic wing, but I don't see how actual Historical re-enactment is a sub-set of LARP. Any objections to me deleting this categorisation? Salvianus 22:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- O.K, I've done that. Salvianus 23:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
