Wikipedia talk:WikiProject International law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Scope

To start off, I've made a list of topics in international law, which I suggest could outline the scope of this WikiProject. At the moment most of the articles in the list are quite brief or non-existent. That an international and multilingual encyclopedia like Wikipedia lacks a comprehensive and consistent section on international law is a situation which should be rectified.

With some refinement, this list could also provide the basic framework for a template.

I've taken the first steps to set up this project. Please feel free to dig in and improve. Yeu Ninje 04:07, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

I looked at public international law back in the 1960s and have noticed the need for there to be more coherent material on Wiki. I was going to start adding one or two conceptual pages which I know will not have changed that much over the years when I've finished the current set of legal page rewrites. The Conflict material is an almost complete draft save for Trusts. If anyone can add that for me, I would appreciate it since I do not have much time at present. Equally, if you have a most desired list of pages, I will prioritorise accordingly. David91

Laws of War are not entirely synonymous with international humanitarian law. There is IHL that is not related to wars; and there are laws of war that can't really be characterized as humanitarian in nature. From what I can tell, the distinction is a matter of ongoing debate among international lawyers and scholars in the field. --Leifern 13:57, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed infobox for treaties

I'll design it later, but for now I propose that it include the following elements:

  • Name of treaty
  • Dates of execution, e.g., drafted, signed, executed, went into effect
  • Contracting parties
  • Mediating parties or organizations
  • Type of treaty, e.g., peace, trade, environmental, etc.
  • International organizations involved, if relevant

Anything else? --Leifern 14:06, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

You might want to add offical languages and depository nation/organization. And for practical reasons, number of signatories might be more useful for large multilateral treaties rather than a full list, e.g. NPT, the UN Charter etc. 180+ countries do take up a lot of space (it could link to a seperate list). Just a thought. ––Cybbe 14:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
I just looked at the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea article, and the list of signatory nations didnt look too bad. --Cybbe 14:27, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Here's a first cut: Template:Infobox Treaty. Since the mediating party is less relevant unless it is also the same as the depository party, I took that out. I suggest that as a matter of usage, we either indicate a link to a list, or a description when they are mulilateral treaties. We should probably try this out on a couple of treaties to see how it works. --Leifern 14:41, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
I have implemented it on Convention of Constantinople and Convention of Moss --Leifern 14:59, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Nice, very nice. BD2412 T 16:40, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Great job, Leifern. Yeu Ninje 22:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] {{LawUnref}}

Note - I have created a modification of the {{unreferenced}} template for law articles - {{LawUnref}}, which puts articles into Category:Law-related articles lacking sources. I have substituted this for the regular unref template on some law articles in Category:Articles lacking sources. Please use this as a resource to note law-related articles that require references. Cheers! BD2412 T 15:23, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

It might be useful to compile a list of commonly used references within the project space as a starting point for new articles. I find the judicial atlas a great starting point for articles on EU law and judicial co-operation within the EU. Anyone got any other sources? --TimPope 20:17, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Citation and article titles on ICJ cases

A few cases are on List of International Court of Justice cases. If we are to build up a database of international law cases then perhaps we need some standard for naming and citing cases.

ICJ Cases are conventionally referred to by subject matter as well as by name. For example:

  1. Nicaragua case (Merits)
  2. Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America) (Merits) [1984] ICJ Reports 392.

I suggest that within the text we use the first citation. For example, "in the Nicaragua case (Merits), the ICJ found that the United States was in breach of its obligation under customary international law not to intervene in the affairs of another State." The more detailed second style of citation can be provided in endnotes, as in Sources of international law.

At the moment the case is entitled Nicaragua v. United States, which could potentially be problematic if there were many cases between the two countries. By contrast, LaGrand case (Germany v. USA) (Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures) is simply entitled LaGrand case. Do we need to standardise the article titles? Yeu Ninje 03:21, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] ILO Conventions

Hi. I've started creating the International Labour Organization Conventions (as part of Wikiproject Organized Labour). They're in Category:International Labour Organization Conventions, and I was thinking of adding the cat as a sub-cat of Category:International law. Does that make sense, or am I off base on the relevance of the Conventions. --Bookandcoffee 03:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

That makes sense. Thank you for your efforts. David91 03:42, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Done. :)--Bookandcoffee 03:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] UNOmbud

Could someone take a look at UNOmbud? It is described as an international organization but there's only 50 hits for the term on Google and they all point back to Wikipedia. Does this organization actually exist? Perhaps it's a typo? Someone with more expertise than I, please check it out. Pimlottc 21:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:David91

Per a request on Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians, I'm trying to find out if anyone knows what happened to User:David91. David91 was part of Wikipedia:WikiProject International law and he stopped editing around April 12, 2006, when he was admitted to the hospital for some tests. He possibly lived in Singapore (likely in or near Ang Mo Kio which he edited 3 times--but with enough detail to suggest a strong familiarity with the place), and was probably the oldest Wikipedian at the age of 94 (based on a reference from 2003 when he said he was 91). Based on his numerous contributions in law it is possible he was a retired lawyer of some kind. He also contributed to linguistics, sociology, and science fiction articles. In all, he made nearly 5000 edits. He evidently was also a well-respected member of other Internet communities he was involved in during his retirement. Any information on David91 would be appreciated. Thanks.--Alabamaboy 14:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bricker Amendment

For some time I have been working on revisions to the Bricker Amendment article. I finally posted it and have a PR at Wikipedia:Peer review/Bricker Amendment. I'd welcome comments. I know all those references may seem extravagant, but I'm hoping to get it as an FA and those voters want lots of footnotes. PedanticallySpeaking 16:23, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Westphalian sovereignty and Contingent sovereignty needs attention

  • These articles were apparently created as part of a cover history for User:Liliana Dioguardi, who has been suspected to be in the employ of a Kremlin propaganda effort - specifically in her creation and maintenance of the International Council for Democratic Institutions and State Sovereignty article in support of the public legitimacy of that organization. The prominent international news and business magazine The Economist magazine has reported that this organization is likely a front for a Kremlin-sponsored disinformation effort, and has specifically identified the ICDISS article and User:Liliana Dioguardi as part of this effort. See these articles[1][2] and the ICDISS article talk page[3].
  • While these articles seem to be legitimate subjects, Dioguardi is responsible for all, or almost all their content - this makes these articles suspect for NPOV reasons.. I urge Wikipedians with a political theory/history/international relations/international law background to help build these articles beyond their sad "cover story" beginnings. Bwithh 05:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Self-determination

Could someone with a good knowledge of international law please have a look at Self-determination? I think it's a mess (and it has been a mess, various ways, for over a year). This article needs work by someone who understands how to make scholarly use of sources. - Jmabel | Talk 16:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Project directory

Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 22:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] URGENT! See Law of nations

Cleanup required!!!

Law of nationsLaw of nationsLaw of nationsLaw of nations
Yours truly,--Ludvikus 15:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Day Awards

Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 23:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

I've done quite a bit of work on the above article, as a first step towards a project of mine to add information about legality to articles to do with nuclear weapons. I was wondering whether a member (or some members) of the International Law wikiproject, who are better informed than I am, could help out with the following:

(1) Rating the article as it now stands (A-Class, B-Class, or whatever); (2) Providing a to-do list of improvements for the article; (3) Editing the article, adding any information they are able to.

Also, if any of you would like to vote for the article in the Article Improvement Drive, that would be great too!

Thanks, --Jim (Talk) 10:07, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The very article of your namesake!

I think the article on international law could use some work. It reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 07:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Diplomatic incidents

Category:Diplomatic incidents has very recently come into being, and has a mere two articles located within it. As an active member of WikiProject Military history, and someone interested in politics and diplomacy in general, I have for some time wondered about better categorization of those events which, though not military in nature, have crucial effects upon diplomacy. There are already complex trees of categories for terrorism, state terrorism, assassinations, and the history of foreign relations of many separate countries, but I still think it may prove useful, and pertinent, to create, and populate a complex of categories for diplomatic incidents, and particularly for events which, even when not directly "military" or "diplomatic" in nature, have profound effects upon those spheres. (Some examples include the sinking of the RMS Lusitania, the USS Maine, the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the kidnapping of several Israeli soldiers last year, and the Namamugi Incident, just to name a few.) Thoughts, ideas, suggestions? How might we best label these articles so as to indicate their roles in spurring greater diplomatic or military events? Thank you. LordAmeth 17:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Additionally, do concepts in diplomacy which may only be customary fall under this Project? Most of the articles on these topics are in poor shape, and they would certainly benefit from the sustained standardization and attention of a WikiProject. -Fsotrain09 04:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm afraid I'm not a member of this Project, and was just looking for some help and guidance. I, personally, would very strongly second your notion that customary law be covered, as it's an important element of international relations and diplomacy, and widens out "international law" to a much broader set of concepts. Just because something is outside of the Western concept of formal treaties, embassies, etc, doesn't mean that it's not an interesting, important, and valid form of international law. LordAmeth 09:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

Hello all, I am new to this project. I added one article about international law, United States v. Curtiss-Wright, added this information to the Curtiss-Wright article and also added information (and continue to work on) Peremptory norm. I hope to keep working on this.Charleenmerced Talk 15:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced

Merged and redirected to existing United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.. Cheers! bd2412 T 15:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../w/i/k/Wikipedia_talk%7EWikiProject_International_law_7d1e.html"