Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan/Opera categories

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan, an attempt to complete and improve the Gilbert and Sullivan related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
NA	This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the quality scale.

As of this moment — unless I have overlooked anything — all of the operas by Gilbert and/or Sullivan are categorized as described on the project page.

The guideline at Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera#Categories says that each opera should be categorized according to:

• its composer (if there's an "Operas by...." category for that composer)
• its language
• its genre
• the overall Category:Operas

Wikipedia doesn't have a single list of opera genres. There are three lists (Category:opera genres, Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera#Categories, Template:opera genres), and they are not identical. Not every opera is in a genre, and similar works may be categorized differently, as this is somewhat subjective. Many operas are difficult to classify. Nevertheless, we need to agree on a standard with respect to the operas that are part of this Project.

The proposal here settles upon "comic opera" for the operas of Gilbert and/or Sullivan (aside from Ivanhoe), simply because this is the term that Gilbert and Sullivan themselves, as well as most of their contemporaries, and most of the "G&S literature," used, and have continued to use, to describe most of their works. This is the descriptive term used in the topic sentences of most of the articles, as well.

This is not without controversy. Some people call these works operettas, and other people prefer Savoy operas. I have nothing against the word operetta, but it's simply not a term that Gilbert and Sullivan themselves ever used to describe their own work. Generally, their contemporaries didn't either. Indeed, Richard D'Oyly Carte formed the Comedy Opera Company as a reaction to, and a departure from, continental operetta. It would be ironic if their works are put into a category the creators themselves had rejected.

The label "Savoy Opera" is amply documented in the literature, but I am doubtful that it's a "genre." No other opera genre is named for a single theatre. And then, what do you do about works like The Mountebanks and His Excellency, which are clearly in the same style, but never appeared at the Savoy?

There are certainly some works for which the appellation "comic opera" might be considered a stretch, particularly Thespis, The Yeomen of the Guard, and The Beauty Stone. It does not seem worthwhile, however, to create a separate policy just for three works.

Please discuss, and make or suggest revisions. Marc Shepherd 18:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree with the system Marc used to categorize the operas. Note that on the Opera page, they have been discussing deleting the category for "fairy operas", which would affect Iolanthe, but I don't know if they have taken any steps to eliminate the category yet or are still discussing it. Is there something like "fairies in literature" instead? -- Ssilvers 18:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

There is a Category:Fictional fairies and sprites, to which Iolanthe and Fallen Fairies could be moved if this happens. Marc Shepherd 18:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)