Wikipedia:Wikiproject Plants/Peer Reviews

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Peer Reviews subproject of Wikiproject Plants is intended for listing new or dramatically revised articles relating to plants or other botanical subjects for review by our project members.

[edit] Active reviewers

(Note: just sign the list to join, and don't forget to add this page to your watchlist.)

• --SB_Johnny|^talk|_books -- Mostly interested in garden plants and weeds.
• Circeus 18:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• NoahElhardt 01:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requested reviews

• List of palms of the Caribbean - at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of palms of the Caribbean
• Pinguicula moranensis - at Wikipedia:Peer review/Pinguicula moranensis
• Verbascum thapsus - at Wikipedia:Peer_review/Verbascum_thapsus
• Acanthomintha duttonii - removed from GA nominations due to extensive problems with article. Will add some comments to its talk page. KP Botany 18:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• Betulaceae
• Boraginaceae (No apomorphies/characteristics described)
• Cannabaceae (This one is ridiculous!)
• Crassulaceae (No gereral characteristics/apomorpies described)
• Cucurbitaceae (Too short for such an economically important family)
• Cyperaceae (No photos, no apomrphies... Nothing!)
• Fabaceae (No description, we need a picture to describe the flower of Faboideae -I could take it if it wasn't winter!-; Papilionaceae redirects to Fabaceae, shouldn't it redirect to Faboidea?)
• Fagaceae (No apomorphies)
• Malvaceae (Edit war about taxonomy, needs to be rewritten, more about morphology)
• Polygonaceae (No apomorphies described, no pictures)
• Rosaceae (Much about taxonomy but no apomorphies/characteristics)
• Rubiaceae
• Salicaceae (Ok, it's always like that: no apomorphies, no general characteristics, no photos...)
• Scrophulariaceae
• Violaceae (is this an article or a stub?)
• Urticaceae KP Botany 19:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)