Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Peer review/2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Trains WikiProject
General information
Main project page (WP:TWP)  talk
Portal (P:Trains) talk
Project navigation bar talk
Project participants talk
Project banner (doc) {{TWP}} talk
Project category talk
Manual of style (WP:TWP/MOS) talk
Welcome message talk
Departments
Assessments (WP:TWP/A) talk
Peer review (WP:TWP/PR) talk
To do list talk
New article notes talk
Task forces
Article maintenance talk
By country series talk
Categories talk
Images talk
Locomotives talk
Maps talk
Models talk
Monorails talk
Operations talk
Passenger trains talk
Portal talk
Rail transport modelling talk
Timelines talk
edit · changes

This is an archive of old peer reviews conducted by members of WikiProject Trains in 2006. Please do not edit any of the discussions on this page.

[edit] Archived reviews

[edit] Philippine National Railways

Just came by to see what I can do to improve this article. Although it is questionable whether it will reach FA status, especially due to a lack of information (unlike the more successful LRT and MRT articles, which are FAs already), it will be nice if I can get this peer reviewed, even for this article to reach GA status. Any comments (and additional resources) are highly appreciated. --Sky Harbor 13:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I would like to see Template:Infobox Public transit incorporated into the article. What do you think? - Tutmosis 20:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Seems fine with me, but I don't know where I can put it. --Sky Harbor 05:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Beside the lead. The images would have to go though. - Tutmosis 15:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Okay I put a little draft up on the talk page of how it would look. Further paramameters can be added though. - Tutmosis 15:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
I decided to shift some of the pictures around and insert in the infobox. --Sky Harbor 14:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New York, Susquehanna and Western Railway

An anon editor tried to push this one up to GA and FA status without going through the proper channels. I think it looks good, but there are a few tasks that could be done before it moves up. I'm curious to see what the rest of TWP thinks of it. Slambo (Speak) 12:29, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Which anon editor was that? Kether83 04:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
    • It was 68.37.195.31 (talk contribs) on September 23. Taking another look at WP:GAN, I see that the user did try to put it in the queue for a review there, but added it to the html comment and not to the list. I'll fix that... Slambo (Speak) 11:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Okay, I've got all the ducks lined up properly now. It's listed correctly on WP:GAN with the original nominator's sig and {{GAnominee}} is on the article talk page. Slambo (Speak) 13:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)