Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokédex/Article ranking
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is to rank the articles covered by WikiProject Pokédex. Entries should go in National Pokédex order, grouped by evolution, and other natural groupings (i.e. the six Nido- Pokémon should be grouped, as should the three Legendary Birds). Also, add a brief description of their status, completion level, or what needs to be done.
For articles that meet the minimum standards listed in the main WikiProject Pokédex page, one should use the label acceptable. For articles that you think surpass the minimum standards, use good. Note the green coloration. Also note that it's perfectly fine to leave additional notes about what should be done to the article, in black font, after noting that it's acceptable or good.
For pages that need attention, use bold red text labels.
In cases where one or more Pokémon in an evolutionary line have an article, but the others don't, list the forms without pages with a label such as "Does not have article". However, in cases where NONE of the Pokémon in an evolutionary line have an article, it's probably currently best not to list them, to avoid clutter.
Articles should be listed in the "Good articles" section if all the articles in the group have an "acceptable" or higher rating. Otherwise, list the entire group in "Articles needing work".
[edit] Articles needing work
- Corsola - Needs infobox, more info, cleanup
[edit] Good articles
- Charmander - acceptable
- Charmeleon - acceptable
- Charizard - acceptable
- Caterpie - acceptable
- Metapod - acceptable
- Butterfree - acceptable
- Ditto - acceptable
- Deoxys - good, but may need dividing into sections
