Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Campaignbox discussion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This Military history WikiProject page is currently inactive and is kept primarily for historical interest.

If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you may try using the main project discussion page.

It was pointed out in the debates on Battle of Jutland and Battle of Leyte Gulf on WP:FAC that "battle before" and "battle after" are misleading when battles took place simultaneously. Taking Battle of Leyte Gulf as an example, this page explores some possible ways to improve the battlebox. Gdr 17:47, 2004 Nov 5 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Current format

Battle of Leyte Gulf
Battle before Battle after
Battle of Leyte Battle of Ormoc Bay
  • Pro: simple; easily understand; you can navigate through a war by clicking on the "Battle after"
  • Con: misleading if battles are simultaneous; simple chronological sequence may lead to unrelated battles from other parts of the war appearing here; some work to maintain (you have to edit three articles each time you add a battle)

[edit] Proposals

[edit] Related battles

Battle of Leyte Gulf
Related battles
1944-10-201944-12-10 Leyte
1944-10-241944-10-25 Leyte Gulf
1944-11-11 Ormoc Bay
  • Pro: avoids misleading claims about "before" and "after"
  • Con: "related battles" is weak; dates don't fit in column unless you prefer ISO 8601; may be hard to templatize; repeats information about this battle; a lot of work to keep up to date when you add new battles or change dates for existing battles

[edit] War

Move the "War" section of the battlebox down to the bottom and list all the battles in the war.

Battle of Portland
First Anglo-Dutch War
Goodwin SandsPlymouthKentish KnockDungenessLeghornPortlandthe GabbardScheveningen
  • Pro: works well for a small war like the First Anglo-Dutch War; can be templatized so you only have to change one template when you add a battle.
Battle of Leyte Gulf
Pacific War
Pearl HarborPrachuab KhirikhanPrince of Wales and RepulseBadung StraitJava SeaSunda StraitCoral SeaMidwayAleutian IslandsKomandorski IslandsKokodaMilne BayBuna-GonaBismarck SeaLaeGuadalcanalSavo IslandEastern SolomonsCape EsperanceSanta Cruz IslandsNaval GuadalcanalTassafarongaKula GulfKolombangaraVella GulfHoraniuVella LavellaEmpress Augusta BayAttack on RabaulCape St. GeorgeTarawaKwajaleinTrukEniwetokSaipanPhilippine SeaGuamTinianPeleliuAngaurLeyteLeyte GulfOrmoc BayLuzon – Mindanao – Iwo JimaOkinawaTen-GoTokyo BayHiroshima and Nagasaki
  • Pro: good for navigation; can be templatized so you only have to edit one file when you add or rename a battle
  • Con: too big for the Pacific War

[edit] Campaign

Too many battles in a big war to list them all here. So what about dividing the war into campaigns and listing only the battles in the same campaign?

Battle of Leyte Gulf
Philippines Campaign
LeyteLeyte GulfOrmoc BayLuzonMindanao
  • Pro: short, clear, easy to navigate to other battles; can be templatized so you only have one thing to edit when you add or change a battle
  • Con: only shows the campaign (how do you navigate to other campaigns?)

[edit] War/Theater/Campaign

We could make it possible to navigate to other campaigns and theaters by a more complex structure:

Battle of Leyte Gulf
World War II
EuropeAsia PacificNorth AfricaAtlantic
Pacific theater
Southeast Asia – Aleutians – New GuineaBurmaSolomonsGilberts and MarshallsMarianas and PalausPhilippines – Ryukyus – Japan
Philippines campaign
LeyteLeyte GulfOrmoc BayLuzonMindanao
  • Pro: a lot of navigational possibilities; templatizable
  • Con: complex; big; requires a lot of articles to be written; trying to do the work of Template:WWIITheatre so might lead to conflict with the people who developed that template; will inevitably lead to spelling wars over "theatre" versus "theater"