Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisville/Peer review
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The peer review department of WikiProject Louisville conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.
The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality. The process is intended to make marginal and good quality articles to excellent, encyclopedic ones. However, use of a peer review for articles assessed below WikiProject Louisville's B-Class may not be a good use of reviewers' time.
Editors with article requests involving significant policy and/or POV concerns or edit wars should use Wikipedia:Third opinion, Wikipedia:Requests for comment, and/or Noticeboards (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard for living persons and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents for others.) before a peer review.
All reviews are conducted by fellow editors — usually members of WikiProject Louisville. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete. Please consider reviewing someone else's article too, if you request yours :-)
|
[edit] Instructions
[edit] Requesting a review
- Add
peer-review=yes
to the {{WikiProject Louisville}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax). - From there, click on the "request has been made" link that appears in the template. This will open a page to discuss the review of your article.
- Place
=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===
at the top. - Below it, write what you hope to gain from a peer review (what are your goals? FA? GA? etc) and sign by using four tildes (
~~~~
). - Add
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Louisville/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
at the top of the list of requests on this page. - Add a link to your article to the beginning of the Peer Review announcement list.
[edit] Responding to a request
Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====
) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible.
[edit] Archiving
Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a featured article candidate. To archive a review:
- Replace
peer-review=yes
withold-peer-review=yes
in the {{WikiProject Louisville}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page - Move
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisville/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
from this page to the current archive page. - Remove article from Peer review announcement list
[edit] Requests
[edit] Archives
Articles archived - 2006