Wikipedia:WikiProject Indonesia/Peer review
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- WikiProject Indonesia - Peer Review is now WikiProject Indonesia - Status requester
The peer review department of the Indonesia WikiProject conducts reviews for all Indonesia-related articles. The way to do it is to judge a specific article with a specific rating and apply the status for that article (Good Article or Featured Article). In addition to this, collaborators also need to ask for reviews for certain articles (Request for Feedback or Peer Review).
All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the Indonesia WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete.
Contents |
[edit] Request for Feedback
Request for Feedback is the place to ask review for a less-developed article which usually has just started. All contributors are suggested to ask for feedback at this stage when the article is at the start level.
[edit] Instructions
- Go to Request for Feedback and leave the article name there.
- Don't forget to follow the additional instructions on the project page.
- Say thanks! :)
[edit] Good article
Usually, articles are rated as good articles when they pass the start level (see Assessment). Furthermore, evey article is highly recommeded to get a Good Article status before it is nominated as a Featured Article.
[edit] Instructions
[edit] Nominating an article
- List the article at the bottom of the relevant section below using the syntax: {{article|Article Name}} ~~~~ with an edit summary of "Nominating [[Article Name]]"
- If the article is longer than 32kb, add LONG to it.
- Add {{GAnominee}} to the nominated article's talk page.
[edit] Giving status
- If pass
- Remove it from the list using the edit summary "Passed [[Article Name]]"
- Replace {{GAnominee}} with {{GA}} on the article's talk page, and leave a comment about passing the article. (With suggestions, if you can)
- List the article on Wikipedia:Good articles under the appropriate section and update the article count at the end of the section.
- If fail
- Remove it from the list using the edit summary "Failed [[Article Name]]"
- Replace {{GAnominee}} with {{FailedGA|12 August 2006}} on its talk page.
- State which criteria it failed to meet on the article's talk page. Be specific if you can.
- The template {{FGAN}} may help you organize the critique. (The syntax can be found there).
- If your sole criterion for rejecting the article was a lack of appropriate references, please add the article to the Unreferenced GA Nominations list.
- Please look at Good Article for more details
[edit] Peer review
[edit] Instructions
[edit] Requesting a review
- Add
peer-review=yesto the {{WP Indonesia}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax). - From there, click on the "request has been made" link that appears in the template. This will open a page to discuss the review of your article.
- Place
=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===at the top. - Below it, write your reason for nominating the article and sign by using four tildes (
~~~~). - Add
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Indonesia/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}at the top of the list of requests on this page.
[edit] Responding to a request
Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible.
[edit] Archiving
Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a featured article candidate. To archive a review:
- Replace
peer-review=yeswithold-peer-review=yesin the {{WP Indonesia}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page - Move
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Indonesia/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}from this page to the current archive page.
[edit] Featured article
[edit] Nominating an article
- Check the featured article criteria and make sure the article meets all of them before nominating.
- Place {{fac}} on the talk page of the nominated article.
- From there, click on the "leave comments" link.
- If you are resubmitting an article, use the Move button to archive the previous discussion. For example, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Television → Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Television/archive1
- Place ===[[name of nominated article]]=== at the top.
- Below it, write your reason for nominating the article and sign with ~~~~.
- Copy this text:{{Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/name of nominated article}}, then edit this page, pasting the template at the top of the list of candidates. Replace "name of..." with the name of your nomination
[edit] Participating
Everyone is encourage to participate in the nomination.
- To edit nominations in order to comment on them, you must click the "edit" link to the right of the article nomination on which you wish to comment (not the overall page's "edit this page" link).
- If you believe an article meets all of the criteria, write '''Support''' followed by your reasons.
- If you oppose a nomination, write '''Object''' followed by the reason for your objection. Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to "fix" the source of the objection, the objection may be ignored. This includes objections to an article's suitability for the Wikipedia Main Page, unless such suitability can be fixed (featured articles, despite being featured, may be marked so as not to be showcased on the Main Page).
- To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
