Wikipedia:WikiProject Fungi/Fungi Collaboration
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Collaborations |
|---|
|
Article Creation and |
| Arts & entertainment |
| Games & sports |
|
Football (soccer) |
| Geography & places |
| Government & politics |
| Religion |
|
Anglicanism |
| Science & technology |
|
Aviation |
| Miscellaneous |
|
|
The Fungi collaboration is a coordinated effort by WikiProject Fungi to improve Wikipedia's fungus-related content. However, being a member of WikiProject Fungi is not a prerequisite for participation in this collaboration. All Wikipedians, regardless of their level of expertise on the subject, are welcome to contribute.
Aside from the main benefit of creating better fungi articles on Wikipedia, it is hoped that the successful execution of this initiative will a) Attract new editors to work on the Project; b) Improve the writing skills of existing editors; and c) Demonstrate the value of collaboration on Wikipedia. The ultimate goal of the Fungi Collaboration is to get at least one fungus or fungus-related article featured every month.
Contents |
[edit] Nomination procedure
A list of past collaborations can be viewed here.
Any user may nominate an article to be collaborated upon. Nominees should:
- Be about any fungus or directly mycological topic.
- Need a significant amount of work in terms of content, organization, prose, etc.
- Not be in any edit conflict or be under protection.
If you would like to nominate an article, please add it at the bottom of the list of nominees along with a short note describing why you think it should be chosen. Every month, the nominee with the most votes will be chosen for collaboration. All nominees will stay on the nominee list for 3 months whereupon they will be cleared and nominating/voting will start anew. Once selected for collaboration, an article will receive its own sub-page for discussion of how to improve the article.
For more detailed discussion, see the Collaboration talk page.
For Nominators:
Please use the following code when nominating an article.
===[[ARTICLE NAME]] (1 vote, stays until '''May 1st''')
Support:
- (sign with four tildes)
Comments:
- (put your reason for nomination, sign again)
----
For Voters:
Please use the following code when voting to support an article.
#~~~
[edit] Nominations...
Please list nominees below using the code laid out in the above section. Newer nominees should be placed on the bottom of the list. Feel free to vote for as many nominees as you wish, but only once per nomination. Please only vote to indicate support, do not vote in the negative. If you like, add a comment in the comment's section under nomination, or on the collaboration talk page. For the current collaboration, see the template at the top of the page.
The next Fungus collaboration will be chosen on April 1st, 2006.
[edit] Fungus (2 votes, stays until May 1st)
Support:
- Cas Liber 06:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- M&NCenarius 04:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments:
- I forgot the original fungus article. As with Dinosaur, I guess there is a case to be made for this one as well to be first cab off the rank...Cas Liber 06:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- "Fungus" actually was the target of an article improvement drive some months back, but which only yielded limited contributions. This article actually needs a lot of work and there are a lot of important topics that simply aren't covered. Check the "To Do" list and outline I've left on the talk page. Peter G Werner 22:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Shiitake (2 votes, stays until May 1st)
Support:
- Cas Liber 06:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- M&NCenarius 04:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments:
- Another cultivated fungus with a large section on cultivation. Nice basis for an FA but would need alot of work on biology section. Cas Liber 06:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Agaricus bisporus (1 vote, stays until May 1st)
Support:
1.Casliber | talk | contribs 07:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments:
- Starting to shape up a bit (now we got the article name sorted). Well-known and may get some food collaborators interested. has enough info to be an FA. cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 07:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] For more complete articles...
If you think an article is good enough to be a Featured Article Candidate, feel free to nominate it. However, it is recommended that you have the article peer reviewed first. Peer reviewed articles are generally more polished and are often more likely to receive votes of support on the FAC page. If you would like to discuss a particular article before sending it to be reviewed, bring it up on the talk page of the article in question, of this page, or the WikiProject Fungi talk page. If you do send an article for peer review or to the FAC page, please let us know by adding it to the appropriate list below so that we can support it!
In terms of criteria consider proximity to FAC candicacy in terms of work required + personal preference + global importance with respect to other fungi or FA list and wikipedia in general, in whatever ratios you wish...
[edit] Articles in peer review
none currently
[edit] Featured Article Candidates
none currently
[edit] Featured Fungi articles
These articles have become featured! In the unlikely event that a fungus article is removed from the FA list, please add a note below but DO NOT remove it from the list.
