Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations and programs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Points of interest related to Organizations on Wikipedia
Portal - Category - WikiProject - - Deletions - Cleanup

This is a list of transcluded discussions on the deletion of articles related to organizations and social programs. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting.

You can help maintain this list by:

  • adding new items, by adding "{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}}" to the top of the list below (replace PageName with the name of the page to be deleted).
  • removing closed AFDs.
  • removing unrelated discussions.

If you wish, you may also:

  • tag discussions by adding "{{subst:delsort|organizations and social programs}} <small>-- ~~~~</small>" on a new line. You can automate this task by adding {{subst:deltab|organizations and social programs}} to your monobook.js file. See Template:Deltab for instructions.

Consult WP:DEL for Wikipedia's deletion policy. Visit WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day.

Suggested inclusion guidelines for this topic area can be found at WP:ORG.


Contents

[edit] Organizations and programs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --- Deville (Talk) 04:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Power and Interest News Report

corporation or organization for which the article fails to assert any notability. What little content there is seems to be borderline promotional or opinion. Nothing has linked to this article since its creation in 2004. Agent 86 17:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep. Although this article fails to assert the organization's notability, a Google search generates millions of hits, and shows that this organization is very notable on the international scale. --  Nishkid64  Talk  18:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment "Power and Interest News Report" (in quotes) gets roughly 85,000 hits on both Google and Yahoo!. Not in the millions, but still a good number. - Zepheus (ツィフィアス) 20:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
      • KeepPINR is one of the most trusted commentaries on international affairs. Needs to be expanded though.
  • Expand or Delete. Article contentless. User:Yy-bo 21:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, BaseballBaby 09:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Petros471 16:00, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • WHAT THE DANG HECK!?!?!?!?
    • By the way, Delete. Contentless. --Drahcirmy talk Image:Smile.png 19:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
      • Having little content is not grounds for deletion- there are tens of thousands of similar stubs out there.--Wafulz 23:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
        • "contentless" does not mean little content. It means no content. Having no content is grounds for deletion — speedy deletion, no less. However, this article is not contentless. Uncle G 12:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's a pretty notable international publisher and its articles seem to be used pretty often. --Wafulz 17:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • keep. It's a notable site, but I agree the entry needs to be expanded.Samoproducer 15:31, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I have linked and stubbed the article. TerriersFan 02:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I added a link to the SourceWatch profile. Appears to be credible. Guy 17:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 01:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blackwood CC

This is a non-notable non-professional cricket club with non-notable players (none have articles -- the seemingly valid links are all for other persons). There are no Google results for the name of the club and the city. Erechtheus 03:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Note As a result of this AfD, I have now received a message from the creator that was certainly a violation of WP:CIVIL.Erechtheus 04:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete — Not notable enough, and I wouldn't be too sure about the creator's intentions if they break WP:CIVIL. There are many of these cricket clubs in Australia, and Luke is far too general. However, WP:BITE - despite the WP:CIVIL violation (which should be pointed out to him, but he shouldn't be scolded for such). For what its worth, the search engines turn up a fair few hits, but many are irrelevant. Draicone (talk) 10:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: there is a larger (but still small) Blackwood cricket club in Wales, which raises the Google hits, but the Australian one is very minor. Fram 10:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete under A7 (nn-bio). Stephen Turner (Talk) 09:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  15:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AALO (NGO)

Very obscure organization with no proof of notability. Probably vanity and pet project. --Mecanismo | Talk 11:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../w/i/k/Wikipedia%7EWikiProject_Deletion_sorting_Organizations_and_programs_9b06.html"