Wikipedia:WikiProject Caribbean/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Caribbean
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 2 9 4 15
A 1 1 2
Good article GA 1 2 3 1 4 11
B 20 23 21 25 26 115
Start 11 100 148 211 154 624
Stub 66 222 853 430 1571
Assessed 32 194 404 1094 614 2338
Unassessed 0 2 0 0 1128 1130
Total 32 196 404 1094 1742 3468

Welcome to the assessment department of the Caribbean WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about the Caribbean, its governments, people, geography, and history. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Caribbean}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Caribbean articles by quality and Category:Caribbean articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Caribbean WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

[edit] Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Caribbean}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Caribbean
|class= 
|importance= 
|attention= 
|needs-infobox= 
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review= 
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Caribbean articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

[edit] Quality scale

Article progress grading scheme [ v d e ]
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Featured article FA
{{FA-Class}}
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further editing is necessary unless new published information has come to light; but further improvements to the text are often possible. Supernova (as of February 2007)
A
{{A-Class}}
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" (peer-reviewed where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Durian (as of March 2007)
Good article GA
{{GA-Class}}
The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise good. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B
{{B-Class}}
Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. Munich air disaster (as of May 2006) has a lot of helpful material but contains too many lists, and needs more prose content & references.
Start
{{Start-Class}}
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub
{{Stub-Class}}
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. Coffee table book (as of July 2005)

[edit] Importance scale

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of the Caribbean.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

[edit] Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Caribbean}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Caribbean| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

[edit] Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.


Archive This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record.


[edit] April 7, 2007

[edit] April 6, 2007

[edit] April 4, 2007

[edit] April 2, 2007

[edit] April 1, 2007

[edit] March 30, 2007

[edit] March 28, 2007

[edit] March 26, 2007

[edit] March 24, 2007

[edit] March 22, 2007

[edit] March 20, 2007

[edit] March 18, 2007

[edit] March 16, 2007

[edit] March 14, 2007

[edit] March 12, 2007

  • Nuelson Wau reassessed from Stub-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Ryan Hinds reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (No-Class)

[edit] March 10, 2007

[edit] March 8, 2007

  • César Abreu (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) removed.
  • Carmen Belen Richardson reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to B-Class (Mid-Class)
  • François Duvalier reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (High-Class)
  • Garfield Sobers reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (High-Class)
  • Frank Worrell reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Front for the Advancement and Progress of Haïti reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Said Musa reassessed from Stub-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Adrienne Bailon reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Bruce Pairaudeau reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Caridad de la Luz reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Carmen Jovet reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Chita Rivera reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Chris Gayle reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Christina Vidal reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Christopher Crommett reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Claribel Medina reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Gens de couleur reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Bharrat Jagdeo reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (High-Class)
  • Geography of Haiti reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (High-Class)
  • Brent Symonette reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Calypso Rose reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Chandra Sturrup reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Flag of Antigua and Barbuda reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Flag of Aruba reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Fort Riviere reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Adam Rodriguez reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Alanna Ubach reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Antonio Fargas reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Braulio Castillo reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Brenton Parchment reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Bruce Gray reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Bryan Davis reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Cameron Cuffy reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Cammie Smith reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Carl Hooper reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Carl Tuckett reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Carlisle Best reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Carlton Baugh Snr. reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Carlton Baugh, Jr. reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Carmen Dominicci reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Charlie Davis reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Charlie Griffith reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Charran Singh reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Chester Watson reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Christine Amertil reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Christopher Brown reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Chuck Fender reassessed from Stub-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Claude Dambreville reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Foreign aid to Haïti reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Foreign relations of Antigua and Barbuda reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Frank Pais Airport reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Freeport, Bahamas reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Garrison Savannah reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • José Martí Pioneer Organization reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Fazal Mohammed (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] March 6, 2007

[edit] March 4, 2007

[edit] March 2, 2007

[edit] February 28, 2007

[edit] February 26, 2007

[edit] February 25, 2007

[edit] February 24, 2007

[edit] February 23, 2007

[edit] February 22, 2007

  • Cesar Abreu (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) renamed to César Abreu

[edit] February 21, 2007

[edit] February 20, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] February 19, 2007

[edit] February 18, 2007

[edit] February 17, 2007

[edit] February 16, 2007

  • Mother Mary Lange reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (No-Class)

[edit] Worklist

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.


Contact with WP Caribbean/Assessment
See also: assessed article categories. Last update: April 7, 2007
>