Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/Nina Simone
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Nina Simone
Hello everybody, I have requested a review of this B-class article, because I think this artist deserves a good representation in the wiki-encyclopedia. I have been expanding and changing the article since september, as well as add almost Simone's total discography. But because I am a bit new to this, and not completely knowledgable about the more detailed underlying wiki do's and don'ts, I would really appreciate it to hear you comments so that the article can be made better in the future. Marcel flaubert 12:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yannismarou
The article looks well-written to me (in terms of prose). These are the main problems I con point out:
- The article lacks inline citations. I fyou ever decide to nominate it for FAC, try to have at least one inline citation for each paragraph.
- The existing citations, mainly the external links need wikifying. Check any recently promoted FA to see what I mean. And check also Template:Cite book and Template:Cite web.
- When you cite a book, you should mention pages.
- Something more about the citations: they go after the quotation mark not before. I noticed some inconsistency.
- The lead could be further expanded per WP:LEAD.
- "Performing live" provides a nice summary of her unique style, but I would like some more infos and analysis.
- I'm not sure these bolded texts in "Well known songs" are in accord with WP:MoS.
- "Quotations" is a listy section like "Trivia". I think you should get rid of it and incoroporate the quotations there in the main prose if possible.--Yannismarou 08:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks + question
Hi Yannismarou, thanks for your comments, esspecially about the citations and stuff.
Do you mean by inline citations the naming of a source immediatley after the sentence, such as (Simone & Cleary, 1992)? Does this way of citating substitute for the 'automatic' references section that is created as you add references (like [1]), or is it appropriate to do them both together?
Thanks again, it really helps me to see where I need to patch up (or anyone else who wants to of course ;). Any other comments are very welcome!
- It is recommended that inline citations follow the Harvard or the Oxford system. You can check any recently promoted FA (especially biography) and you will understand what I mean.--Yannismarou 07:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)