Wikipedia:WikiProject Asian Americans/Assessments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Asian American articles by quality statistics

Welcome to the assessment department of the Asian American WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Asian Americans. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Asian Americans}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Asian Americans articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Asian Americans WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

[edit] Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Asian Americans}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Asian Americans
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Asian Americans articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

[edit] Quality scale

Article progress grading scheme [  v  d  e  ]
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Featured article FA
{{FA-Class}}
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further editing is necessary unless new published information has come to light; but further improvements to the text are often possible. Supernova (as of February 2007)
A
{{A-Class}}
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" (peer-reviewed where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Durian (as of March 2007)
Good article GA
{{GA-Class}}
The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise good. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B
{{B-Class}}
Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. Munich air disaster (as of May 2006) has a lot of helpful material but contains too many lists, and needs more prose content & references.
Start
{{Start-Class}}
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub
{{Stub-Class}}
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. Coffee table book (as of July 2005)

[edit] Importance scale

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Asian Americans.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

We are currently discussing which articles should be counted as being of Top-importance at Wikipedia:WikiProject Asian Americans/Assessment/Top-importance articles.

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

[edit] Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.


Archive This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record.


[edit] April 7, 2007

[edit] April 6, 2007

[edit] April 4, 2007

[edit] April 2, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] April 1, 2007

[edit] March 30, 2007

[edit] March 28, 2007

[edit] March 26, 2007

[edit] March 24, 2007

  • Denny Chin reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Stub-Class (No-Class)

[edit] March 22, 2007

[edit] March 20, 2007

[edit] March 18, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] March 16, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] March 14, 2007

[edit] March 12, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] March 10, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] March 8, 2007

[edit] March 6, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] March 4, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] March 2, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] February 28, 2007

[edit] February 26, 2007

  • Min Chueh Chang reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to B-Class (No-Class)

[edit] February 25, 2007

[edit] February 24, 2007

[edit] February 23, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] February 22, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] February 21, 2007

[edit] February 20, 2007

[edit] February 19, 2007

(No changes today)

[edit] February 18, 2007

[edit] February 17, 2007

[edit] February 16, 2007

[edit] Worklist

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.


Contact with WP Asian Americans
Article
Date
Comments
Nisei Week [1] Mid December 16, 2006 B
Asian American [2] March 30, 2007 B
Filipino American [3] March 30, 2007 B
George Takei [4] March 22, 2007 B
Indian American [5] March 30, 2007 B
Japanese American [6] March 30, 2007 B
Japanese American internment [7] February 28, 2007 B
Min Chueh Chang [8] February 26, 2007 B
Stereotypes of East and Southeast Asians [9] March 22, 2007 B
Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar [10] March 30, 2007 B
Taiwanese American [11] March 30, 2007 B
American-Born Confused Desi [12] March 30, 2007 Start
American-born Chinese [13] March 30, 2007 Start
Arthur Chin [14] March 30, 2007 Start This article has a good picture, now it just needs more information--Danaman5 21:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC) (edit comment)
Asian American studies [15] March 30, 2007 Start
B. D. Wong [16] March 22, 2007 Start
Better Luck Tomorrow [17] March 30, 2007 Start
Brenda Song [18] March 30, 2007 Start
Chinaman [19] March 26, 2007 Start
Chinaman (disambiguation) [20] April 1, 2007 Start
Chinese American [21] March 30, 2007 Start
Chinese Exclusion Act (United States) [22] March 30, 2007 Start
Chinese Massacre Cove [23] March 30, 2007 Start
Chinese immigration to Hawaii [24] March 30, 2007 Start
Chinese immigration to the United States [25] March 30, 2007 Start
Chink [26] March 30, 2007 Start
David Henry Hwang [27] March 30, 2007 Start
David Ho [28] February 25, 2007 Start Rated start class for the following reasons:
  • Photograph, date of birth present
  • References present but some material unsourced
  • Some information on research interests, but could be expanded.
  • Needs editing for PoV, there are some inflated claims
  • Lacks appropriate subheadings
  • Some useful external links present, but list could do with pruning (edit comment)
East Asian American [29] March 30, 2007 Start
Fortune cookie [30] March 22, 2007 Start
Garrett Wang [31] March 22, 2007 Start
Gary Locke (politician) [32] March 30, 2007 Start
Har Gobind Khorana [33] March 30, 2007 Start
Hartriono B. Sastrowardoyo [34] March 30, 2007 Start
Hazel Ying Lee [35] March 30, 2007 Start
Hindu German Conspiracy Trial [36] March 30, 2007 Start
Immigration Act of 1917 [37] March 30, 2007 Start
Japanese language education in the United States [38] March 22, 2007 Start
Jennifer 8. Lee [39] March 30, 2007 Start
Jessamyn Liu [40] March 30, 2007 Start
Jian Li [41] January 26, 2007 Start
Kal Penn [42] March 30, 2007 Start
Kelly Hu [43] March 30, 2007 Start
Kimiko Hahn [44] March 30, 2007 Start
Korean American [45] March 30, 2007 Start
Li-Young Lee [46] March 30, 2007 Start
Little Tokyo, Los Angeles, California [47] March 30, 2007 Start
Los Angeles Tofu Festival [48] March 22, 2007 Start
Luce-Celler Act of 1946 [49] March 30, 2007 Start
Lucy Liu [50] March 30, 2007 Start
Maggie Q [51] March 30, 2007 Start
Manzanar [52] March 30, 2007 Start
Michelle Park Steel [53] March 22, 2007 Start
Ming-Na [54] March 30, 2007 Start
Pat Morita [55] March 30, 2007 Start
Racial classification of Indian Americans [56] March 30, 2007 Start
Racist love [57] March 30, 2007 Start
S. R. Sidarth [58] March 30, 2007 Start
Thai American [59] March 30, 2007 Start
Tibetan American [60] March 30, 2007 Start
United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind [61] March 22, 2007 Start
Vincent Chin [62] March 30, 2007 Start
Yellow Peril [63] March 22, 2007 Start
Yellowworld [64] March 22, 2007 Start
1.5 generation [65] March 22, 2007 Stub
80-20 Initiative [66] March 22, 2007 Stub
A Magazine [67] March 30, 2007 Stub
Asian American Immigration History [68] March 30, 2007 Stub
Asian American Journalists Association [69] March 30, 2007 Stub
Asian American Writers' Workshop [70] March 30, 2007 Stub
Asian pride [71] March 30, 2007 Stub
Balbir Singh Sodhi [72] March 30, 2007 Stub
Bandhak [73] March 30, 2007 Stub
Bellingham riots [74] March 30, 2007 Stub
Burmese American [75] March 30, 2007 Stub
California Alien Land Law of 1913 [76] March 30, 2007 Stub
Cambodian American [77] March 30, 2007 Stub
Chin Lin Sou [78] March 30, 2007 Stub
Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992 [79] March 30, 2007 Stub
Cy Young (animator) [80] March 30, 2007 Stub
Dalip Singh Saund [81] March 30, 2007 Stub
Denny Chin [82] March 24, 2007 Stub
Emil Guillermo [83] March 30, 2007 Stub
Giant Robot (magazine) [84] March 30, 2007 Stub
Hyphen (magazine) [85] March 30, 2007 Stub
Indian American history [86] March 30, 2007 Stub
Indian American media [87] March 30, 2007 Stub
Indo-Caribbean American [88] March 30, 2007 Stub
Indonesian American [89] March 30, 2007 Stub
Japanese in Hawaii [90] March 20, 2007 Stub
Japanese-American Claims Act [91] March 30, 2007 Stub
Jay Chandrasekhar [92] March 30, 2007 Stub
Jeff Chang (journalist) [93] March 30, 2007 Stub
Jimmy Meng [94] March 30, 2007 Stub
John Liu [95] March 30, 2007 Stub
Justin Lin (director) [96] March 30, 2007 Stub
Louie Yim-Qun [97] March 30, 2007 Stub
Mongolian American [98] March 30, 2007 Stub
Organization of Chinese Americans [99] March 30, 2007 Stub
Russell Wong [100] March 30, 2007 Stub
South Asian Journalists Association [101] March 30, 2007 Stub
Sri Lankan American [102] March 30, 2007 Stub
Takuji Yamashita [103] March 30, 2007 Stub
Turban Tide and Hindoo Invasion [104] March 30, 2007 Stub
Anna Mae He [105] January 26, 2007 Unassessed
Chinaman's chance [106] April 7, 2007 Unassessed
Frank Chin [107] April 6, 2007 Unassessed
Guy Aoki [108] February 2, 2007 Unassessed
Jade Ribbon Campaign [109] January 26, 2007 Unassessed
List of Asian American-related topics [110] February 2, 2007 Unassessed
List of Chinese American Associations [111] February 3, 2007 Unassessed
List of Indian Americans [112] January 3, 2007 Unassessed
List of U.S. communities with Asian American majority populations [113] January 16, 2007 Unassessed
Mark Britten [114] April 7, 2007 Unassessed
Rock Springs Massacre [115] March 26, 2007 Unassessed
See also: assessed article categories. Last update: April 7, 2007