Wikipedia:WikiLove
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an essay. It is not a policy or guideline, it simply reflects some opinions of its authors. Please update the page as needed, or discuss it on the talk page. |
WikiLove is a term that refers to a general spirit of collegiality and mutual understanding. It was coined over time on the Wikipedia:Mailing lists. Because people coming from radically different perspectives work on Wikipedia together – religious fundamentalists and secular humanists, conservatives and socialists, etc. – it is easy for discussions to degenerate into flamewars. But we are all here for one reason: we love accumulating, ordering, structuring, and making freely available what knowledge we have in the form of an encyclopedia of unprecedented size. Wikipedia is not just another discussion forum — it is a project to describe and collect what we know.
If we keep this common goal, this love of knowledge, in mind, if we concentrate on achieving a neutral point of view even when it is difficult, if we try to actually understand what the other side has to say, then we can reach the state of "WikiLove". If we fail to achieve WikiLove, this will only mean that the encyclopedia and its mission as a whole will suffer. Constant flamewars drive contributors away, biased articles drive readers away, and both harm our reputation in the long term.
There is no secret formula to achieve WikiLove, but there are key components:
- Follow Wikiquette – respect other contributors.
- Love newcomers even more.
- Follow our policies – they make it easier to work with one another.
- Aim for a neutral point of view – write articles that people from all sides can read and agree with.
- Stay cool – don't react hasty in anger. Instead, take some distance if you're feeling mad.
- Forgive and forget – remember, this is the Internet. Don't allow yourself to be hurt; do try to accommodate other people's views. Rather try to follow the spirit of Ahimsa: neither mentally, verbally, or physically do injury, whether by doing it oneself, getting it done by others, or approving it when done by others.
- Remember that your fellow editors are not part of your operating system, or 'genies in a lamp', etc., everyone likes to feel appreciated, and even if you are making a negative comment, it's always good to start with a thank you, and maybe end with a thank you if making a request:
- "Hi, thank you for your comments on my edit, which you reverted. I would appreciate if you would please look at this version (...) Again, thank you for your time."
- "Hi, and thank you for contributing to the article on Migratory birds. I believe you are mistaken about (...) however. I have edited it for factuality, would you mind reading it again when you can? Thanks again.
- "Cheers on your good work on Clothing! Since you seem knowledgeable on the subject, could you explain what you meant by (...). I read it, but the meaning wasn't clear from the context. Perhaps you could make it more understandable to the layman, or provide some links for further study? Thanks! (etc.)
Happy editing and let WikiLove spread the internet cables!
