Template:WikiProject Louisville
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Template:WikiProject Louisville is within the scope of WikiProject Louisville, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of metropolitan Louisville, Kentucky and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Template Usage] [Watch Project Articles] [Project Talk] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's importance scale. | |
 |
Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page. | |
 |
This template employs intricate features of template syntax. Please do not alter it unless you are certain to understand its setup and parser functions and are ready to repair/revert all collateral damage if results are unexpected. Any experiments should be conducted and all improvements tested in either the template sandbox or your user space before applying anything here. |
[edit] Usage
This template categorizes pages using assessment grades and importance through built-in transclusion. An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Louisville|class=???|importance=???}} banner on its talk page. This template should be transcluded and not substituted (subst) because it employs conditional code. Transclusion also allows easy updating of all the Project's talk pages without having to edit hundreds of pages.
[edit] Other parameters
- small=yes — makes the template small and along the right side of the page (as opposed to at the top).
- attention=yes — the article needs immediate attention
- reassess=yes — request a reassessment for this article
- merge=yes — the article is a candidate for merge action with one or more other articles
- needs-infobox=yes — the article needs an infobox (places in category only)
- peer-review=yes — request a peer review for this article
- old-peer-review=yes — peer review is complete and archived
