User talk:Wieners
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] New Twilight Zone Project
Hope you want hold me to a very strict timeline--how about if I can have the reviews ready in a week or three? Sir Rhosis 22:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
MOVED HERE:(I think I may have posted a note to you on the wrong. I'll try to have the two reviews promised in two-three weks. Sir Rhosis 22:42, 5 May 2006 (UTC))
Thats great. Try to get the opening and or closing narrations. The're important I think, look at my main page to see the info I've included on the other episodes. I can get the info like director and cast, so don't worry about those. I would like: Plot, Opening Narration, Synopsis, Closing Narration, Themes and Trivia. So... just post what you've got here I guess and I'll put it on the episode pages. -Wieners 22:59, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
I have the DVDs, so no problem on the narrations. Since "Charity" was based on a short story, would you mind a little trvia along the lines of changes in the adaptation, plus a little actor trivia (Kerry Noonan who played Charity is now a college professor, specializing in women's studies and folklore, etc.?) Sir Rhosis
Yeah, anything like that is fine. I have trouble doing the episodes though since I don't have the DVD's yet. -Wieners 23:08, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey Wieners, I run the Postcards from the Zone New TZ blog. If you think I could help you in any way, contact me at tzblog_at_gmail_dot_com.
[edit] Page Blanking
On 5-May, you blanked Teacher's Day (The Twilight Zone). Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. Based upon your edit summary, I redirected this article to Teacher's Aide (The Twilight Zone). If you believe the redirect should be deleted, please follow the redirect portion of the deletion procedures. In the future, if you believe an article should be renamed, please follow the renaming procedures vs. copying and pasting the text (the reasons for why are provided on the instruction page). If you have questions, please let me know. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 01:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I realized that after I did it and I had no idea how to delete the page. So I just left it hoping someone else would Wieners 01:36, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. There's a lot to learn. Most people are willing to help so don't be hesitant to ask questions if needed. -- JLaTondre 02:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Walrus2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Walrus2.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Brand New Genre
No need to be rude, sir. I was simply reverting what seemed to be genre vandalism. I have tons of bands on my watch-list, and trolls are constantly taking the emo tag off of bands. Your perception of a band is no better than mine, I always take into consideration a consensus. So i'm going to leave it as alternative rock/pop-punk (since I know that for a fact), I'll take up a discussion/vote for the emo tag. Again, sorry if I took this the wrong way, but I just get tired of the vandals some times. Have a nice day! --DieHard2k5 23:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Homomobile
The article Homomobile has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. -- Vary | Talk 17:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Splittist Logo
Thanks, that's great. It's now shown on the Association page. Owen 05:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Q (Street Fighter) and HUNK (Resident Evil)
Please stop splitting these low-quality articles out again. They share the problem that they both fail WP:N and WP:FICT; in short, there is a dearth of referenceable reliable sources independent of the fictional works in which they appear. HUNK has been discussed extensively at Talk:Characters in Resident Evil 2#HUNK split, and Q has been discussed multiple times, including here and here.
Unless you are prepared to offer third-party commentary in reliable sources (so not a Capcom book or a fansite), please don't split these again. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 20:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
