Talk:Whittaker and Watson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Abramowitz and Stegun is a modern successor" is tremendously innacurate. How does this type of post survive?
- Would you like to explain that? We are talking about authoritative texts on special functions. If you want to make the point that A&S is not a comparable text on the side of analysis, yes, that can be mentioned. Charles Matthews 14:04, 28 February 2006 (UTC)