Talk:Whites Bridge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Michigan, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Michigan. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges, a WikiProject which aims to expand coverage of bridges on Wikipedia. Please feel free to join us. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| DYK | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on December 29, 2006 |
[edit] Possible reference
what about this bridge in the movie beetlejuice? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.101.225.38 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fixed Formatting
Good article... fixed the whitespace under the "history" headline.--Dk69 01:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Formatting
The Layout still looks like utter crap at 1280x1024.. there are about 15 lines of whitespace under 'history'.. I do see the point about it looking bad at 800x600, but honestly who uses this resolution anymore? Maybe somebody better at formatting than I can fix this.--Dk69 17:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well!!! Lots of edits around the images. Thanks for the gallery try but I changed it back. I won't go back to the moving pics back and forth but I'm a bit of a fan of having all the pics on one side. The pics are all relevant to the article and their captions make points that go with where I originally placed them. Thoughts? Note that if there's a solution here, it probably should be done to Ada Covered Bridge also originated by me and somewhat similar in how its images are laid out. Thanks as well for your kind words about the article, I'm rather proud of it. ++Lar: t/c 05:09, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ada Covered Bridge looks fine at my resolution. Personally its just probably nitpicky on my end. It may flow a little bit better if you place the images before the "==History==" headline instead of after. This will place the whitespace after the end of design, and still keep everything lined up basically the same way. Did you mean to leave out the WhitesBridge FlatRiver Marker Dscn9971crop.jpg? To me it seems relevant. Why the hate for the gallery application? It makes things a lot cleaner IMO. I'll let you make the edit if you want... There's bigger fish to fry!--Dk69 05:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- I just reverted to the most recent change before the gallery... my original layout was a lot different, but I figured if a lot of people had tried different things I wasn't going to go all the way back to square 1. I'll take a look and see if some pic is missing or not. The marker may or may not be that important since it is text that is reproduced in the article. (I could go either way) Thanks! ++Lar: t/c 13:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ada Covered Bridge looks fine at my resolution. Personally its just probably nitpicky on my end. It may flow a little bit better if you place the images before the "==History==" headline instead of after. This will place the whitespace after the end of design, and still keep everything lined up basically the same way. Did you mean to leave out the WhitesBridge FlatRiver Marker Dscn9971crop.jpg? To me it seems relevant. Why the hate for the gallery application? It makes things a lot cleaner IMO. I'll let you make the edit if you want... There's bigger fish to fry!--Dk69 05:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
