Talk:Westminster Larger Catechism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christianity Portal Westminster Larger Catechism is part of the WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familier with the guidelines.

Start

This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

	Calvinism Portal Westminster Larger Catechism falls within the scope of WikiProject Calvinism, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Calvinism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familier with the guidelines.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Wikisource

Would this not be Wikisource? -- user:zanimum

No :)

Seriously, this definitely doesn't belong in Wikipedia, it might be suitable for Wikisource. --Robert Merkel 12:30, 5 May 2004 (UTC)

First time I've heard of Wikisource! I'm checking it as I type... I suppose it probably is a borderline Wikisource, except that it is not as long as the ones I've just scanned. I just thought that it would be good to have the actual source material in the encyclopaedia entry. I've done the same with Westminster Shorter Catechism and Thirty-Nine Articles. What is the policy with this? One Salient Oversight 12:37, 5 May 2004 (UTC)

I see that Robert M has deleted most of the article. Oh well. Should I also delete the primary source material in the Shorter Catechism and the 39 articles RObert? One Salient Oversight 12:49, 5 May 2004 (UTC)

Yes. Wikipedia:don't include copies of primary sources. However, it would be really good if you could add to the Wikipedia articles explaining what these documents are, how they were written, how they have influenced things since, and so on.

--Robert Merkel 12:53, 5 May 2004 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks for your help Robert. One Salient Oversight 12:55, 5 May 2004 (UTC)

So has it been included on Wikisource? -- user:zanimum

I just added it to Wikisource. -- Rich Blinne 30 November 2004, 20:53 (UTC)