Talk:Wenceslaus II of Bohemia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wenceslaus II of Bohemia is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Poland on Wikipedia. To participate simply edit the article or see our current projects and discussions. On the main project page we have some tools to help you out. Don't hesitate to ask questions!
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
This article is part of WikiProject Czech Republic, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the Czech Republic. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

After a few moves without discussion, we have "Venceslaus II of Bohemia, Wenceslaus II Premyslid ...", while his son is listed under "Wenceslaus III of Bohemia, Wenceslaus III Premyslid ...". How about consistency? -- Matthead discuß!   O    23:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question re early 15th C. Wenceslas

According to a couple of books I read recently on the Teutonic Order and the 1410 Battle of Tannenberg (Grunwald / Zirgalis), there was a King Wenceslas, or Wenceslaus, of Bohemia who attempted to mediate between the Teutonic Order and the King of Poland in 1409. I don't find this personage on the disambugation list. What's up?

Sca 15:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


Why was this moved? Wenceslaus is the English spelling and the ducal articles conform to it. Srnec 23:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.