Talk:Weird NJ
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Controversy
When I rewrote the article I left out the part about a controversy about the Ramapough Mountains Indians because I could not find any evidence that the controversy was that significant (or existed, but Im sure it did). I also could not find any information about any controversy about promoting tresspassing which I vaguely remember, does anyone know anymore?
- Wouldn't that be the Ramapo Mountains? _ Nunh-huh
- Ramapough Mountain Indians seems to say there are two possible spellingsMechBrowman 04:26, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)MechBrowman
[edit] Website
Is there really any reason to mention the websites? They aren't really anything more than ads and portals for basic information about the magazine and books. It's like mentioning that Coca-Cola has a website, or CNN. Everyone has a website.
- Really, I don't see any reason why NOT to include the website. It's convenient for the user who wants to go on to the primary source. If I'm reading about CNN, I would find it convenient to be able to click directly to the CNN site to see for myself. Same here. (D.B. Echo, Feb. 19, 2006)
- Exactly...Those are the official websites. They're a part of what "Weird NJ" is. It is relevant. Michael 08:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)