Talk:Warlords Battlecry II
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] WP:VG Assessment
- Nice.
- The lead section is poor. See WP:LS, and try to include an element from each of the sections in it.
- Gameplay is way too long and is too much of a game guide - this is further reinforced by only including the game manual as reference for this section. Just delete game modes - a common observation in newly created/edited game articles is the inclusion of a section like this, which doesn't really add anything. A link to Campaign (role-playing games) with the simple note that it's non-linear and an external link to the manual would tell the player exactly as much as this whole section. The same applies for the roleplaying elements and strategic elements - just try to be more concise, and exclude any information found in the manual. If there's nothing more to tell than the manual writes, don't do it - just summarize the game in three paragraphs, because that's useful for the other sections. As a general pointer, try to include ten paragraphs of about 4-6 sentences each in this whole section, without moving the information elsewhere.
- Gameplay needs more wikilinks, too.
- Needs more images.
- Development and reception are a little light, but ok.
- Don't list the manual like it currently is in the references. Just write the whole title/publisher thing the first time it's referenced (in the <ref> itself).
- Start, Low. A few images and revamping the Gameplay section would earn you a B.
--User:Krator (t c) 14:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for giving feedback so quickly. I'll start work on it as soon as I can. UnaLaguna 15:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)