Talk:Wade Keller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Stub

This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

Turns out there is a Bryan Alvarez page now.

Who is this Keller34 jerk who keeps spamming the article?

Why is the Nora Greenwald romance joke/rumor considered "irrelevant"? Irrelevant to what?

It doesn't seem to me that it would seem deemable to appear in a encyclopedia article. The article is about Keller as a journalist... not about his personal life.

I didn't realize it was only about Wade Keller the Journalist. There is simply little-to-no information about his personal life.

I could see that for more famous celebrities & stuff... maybe someone else can chime in on whether or not to include it... (same person as 2 posts above)

But wouldn't famous celebrities have more than enough information about themselves? I'll leave off the Greenwald romance joke/rumor (it's openly acknowledged on the Torch website as a joke, but everyone discusses it as if it's serious gossip), but I think any biographical pages should have a happy balance of personal AND professional. By the way, Wade has a cat. We don't know her name.

This is to youse guys who keep vandializing this page...PLEASE STOP, or at least come up with some new material!!!!

--I agree. Do you really not have anything better to do than to vandalize an article? Maybe you could try poking some Jello with a stick or something.

But surely Keller's smartass whiny dirt sheet, and the baseless accusations aginst any wrestlers or bookers he has a personal grudge against deserve a response in kind. Only when the observer stops the mudslinging and clear personal bias should the "vandialising" come to a halt.

--And how exactly is constant meaningless vandalism "a response in kind"? It's stupid and pathetic. If someone has that much time to keep vandalizing a Wikipedia article, why don't they channel that energy into writing some constructive criticism?

(P.S.) Whatever mudslinging the Observer is doing has nothing to do with Keller or the Torch.

[edit] Controversy

I don't see how confusing names in one issue of the Torch is merit of a write-up... but to each his own I guess. I would think questioning his credibility would cite such sources as when he was sure Hogan was coming back and did not and other such instances. I don't think we need to word-for-word those paragraphs you cited, so I paraphrased them. 12.34.246.36 18:09, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why was the picture removed?

The source of the picture was given when it was first uploaded. It was hosted at www.gumgod.com, and voluntarily provided by the webmaster.--204.246.229.147 16:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Probably because it's not a real picture of Wade Keller. Mr Keller in fact weighs 457 pounds, and has very oily skin. 20 August 2006