Talk:W. M. Keck Observatory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to astronomy. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 01:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Keck telescopes → W. M. Keck Observatory — The formal name for the observatory should be used for the article title. Dr. Submillimeter 14:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
[edit] Survey - in support of the move
- Support - Dr. Submillimeter 14:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Formal name wins. Recury 20:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Coneslayer 14:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support per nom. — (As a side-note, Mauna Kea Observatory should be moved to Mauna Kea Observatories, because they are "an independent collection" of astronomical observatories, including the W. M. Keck Observatory.)--Endroit 04:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey - in opposition to the move
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
