User talk:Vudujava

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Hi there, I'm a 41 year old male, married, no kids. Considering a job offer in Detroit, and I wonder what life in Detroit is like. We are more following the "Yuppie" lifestyle, restaurants, bars, a nice live music spot from time to time. On the weekends, walking, hiking. Play tennis, some golf. Shopping, working out in a gym. Would prefer to live in a lively, clean and safe neighbourhood, preferrably in a well managed appartment building. Any suggestions? (ralf.stoehr@gmx.net)

---

Just finished reformatting and rewriting the erotic actor section, partially to balance the page out and partially to give better information. Comment if you wish. Please feel free to add anything you feel I've left out :vudu 00:45, 14 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Added history to the Wonderland Murders page (it only contained an update about Eddie Nash, a principle in the case) and commented on the new John Holmes talk page. It appears that someone claiming to be John Holmes widow commented about what a nice guy he was, while plugging the John Holmes pay porn site.
While I'm on the subject of porn stars, I have a question: I see a lot of new entries being made on the erotic actors page, does anyone plan on ever writing biographies for all of these people? I will admit to having added a number of people to the list myself, but I've also been writing bio's for them. Eventually, I will get to writing bio's for every entry I've made (if someone doesn't beat me to the punch). Why do people add 20 obscure names to these pages and then fail to write biographies for them? I just find it annoying. vudu 17:21, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

No problem. Can you confirm that the text at Merchant Marine is correct? It was basically a guess based on the former content of Merchant marine, which I wanted to move due to Americocentrism. Do you know that my suppositions were correct? Tuf-Kat 03:32, Sep 23, 2003 (UTC)

Well, I know it's not a strictly US thing, because the CIA listed it in all of the Communication of XXX articles (where XXX = a country). The reason it appeared on the most wanted pages list is because I linked to it in many of these articles, because I didn't know what it was and wanted someone to fill it in. So, thanks for at least giving me a general idea of the term. Toke on, Tuf-Kat

the picture of natalie portman is from a movie premiere, not a magazine. SargeBaldy 3 Oct 2003

Hi. You can go to Gina Lynn and edit it yourself. It will probably take you to Ginger Lynn, but all you have to do is click on the Gina Lynn link at the top of the page then edit that page, removing the Redirect. RickK 03:35, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)

I find it interesting that you come after this article within hours of the time I mention factual mistakes you made Ginger Lynn/Gina Lynn.

I have no idea what you're talking about. I have no recollection of even having made edits concerning Ginger Lynn or Gina Lynn, and I certainly didn't redirect one to the other. I had not even read your comments on my talk page until tonight, the day after I made the comments on the 12th Street Riot page. I don't care what your feelings for me are, one way or the other, but don't try to imply that I'm out for revenge against you because of some idea that I disagreed with you on some article that I never even touched. Look at the history of Gina Lynn and you'll see that I never touched that page. And all I did on the Ginger Lynn page was to try to make some sense out of what someone had bulked together into one page with no rhyme or reason. It was simply an editorial edit, not a content edit -- I have no idea who Ginger Lynn OR Gina Lynn is, nor do I particularly care. Nor do I particularly care about you, despite your seeming trumped-up opinion of yourself. Having said that, in order not to make you think that I'm attacking you by attacking the 12th Street Riot page, I will back off from editing it, but I will put it on the Wikipedia:Pages needing attention page, so someone else can have a go at it. Wouldn't want to buff up your ego any. BTW, until all of this came up, I don't recall having even heard of you. RickK 04:10, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Copied from Vandalism in Progress:

  • In his KingPr0n's defense, the alterations on the porn star pages were genuine additions of genuine information, albeit concerned exclusively with anal sex. Of course, that subject's not wildly surprising on a page about a porn star. (Whether it belong in wikipedia is another story.) But it can't objectively be called vandalism, I don't think. By the way, both starlet pages use the euphemism "erotic actress" rather than the more stright-forward and obvious "porn star". Why the weasel words? orthogonal 22:08, 13 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hello,

yes. My revert might have been a bit hasty. I suggest you can put in your version again, and we can work on this (or we work on the current version). Ok? I am quite sure we can create a text that we both like.

cu, --zeno 09:39, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)

[edit] St. Louis Blues

EMERGENCY! Infrogmation has vandalised your contributions to St. Louis Blues. Please ask all hockey fans to vote at Talk:St. Louis Blues to keep St. Louis Blues as a National Hockey League page and not a redirect to a disambiguation page. Thank You! -- 24.217.211.99 07:30, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

[edit] How about Tia Bella

No article on Tia Bella - want to throw one together? -- BD2412 talk 17:05, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Hi. No idea why the previous Tia Bella article was deleted, but I've made another effort at it. Hopefully this one will stay up; it isn't like there aren't any other articles about porn stars on Wikipedia. -EdgarAllanToe 13:43, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../v/u/d/User_talk%7EVudujava_cb69.html"