Talk:VSpot Top 20 Countdown

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cool- Gwen Stefani reached #1 as well as Since U Been Gone and Candy Shop!

Kane (not to be confused with Glen Jacobs, the WWE Superstar that is called Kane), a DJ that was at then-WXRK in New York (now WFNY-FM), also hosted this program, in its earlier days. I know he at least hosted it once, but I don't know when and whether we should add it to the article. 70.111.8.182 04:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] #1 video list should be completed

the list of #1 videos on vh1's top 20 between 2002 and present is still incompleted for a while or a long time ever since. so please it still needs to expanded it.66.80.76.138 22:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Listing

The article might be OK; the listing, though, turns Wikipedia into just an outlet for their "countdown". --Mel Etitis (Talk) 15:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List

Wikipedia is an encyclopædia, not a charts listing site. There's link to their site if people are desperate to know what the Lithuanian charts are. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 10:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Yes, but on their site they don't have the list and there aren't any other places I know of that have it. It's also been posted on here for awhile now and as far as I know no one else has minded it being on here. (By the way, I wasn't "reverting" I wasn't even online at the time.) Chris9086 01:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
  1. I'm not sure what you mean with regard to reverting &mdask; as the History shows, you reverted to the lists.
  2. It doesn't matter how long inappropriate content has been here; it doesn't gain squatter's rights. We're not a chart magazine; moreover the lists were unsourced. Please don't replace them.
  3. If you wish to discuss the issue, I've raised it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music#Charts (again). --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 20/20 Club or Retired Videos List

I don't mind that the list of #1 Videos was taken off the article, but shouldn't at least the Retired Videos List stay in the article? The TRL article has that list... heck, the list is an article itself (see List of Total Request Live retired videos). --Andresg770 02:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

What makes the list a suitable article for an encyclopædia? --Mel Etitis (Talk) 10:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
I agree, retired videos is a good thing. It's encyclopedic too. And when it eventually gets big, it will be made into a new article, like TRL's. 66.140.218.152 14:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
That's what I've been saying. Chris9086 15:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

But neither of you has answered the question: What makes the list a suitable article for an encyclopædia? Simply repeating that it is suitable isn't an answer. The two AfDs on lists created in order to bypass this page bear me out: unanimous rejection of the lists, and their deletion --Mel Etitis (Talk) 15:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

I've seen encyclopedia articles with lists. There's also List of Total Request Live retired videos which is exactly the same and you haven't said anything about that. Chris9086 15:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
"There's another one like it" isn't an answer to my question. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 17:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)