Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Virtual studio

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 20:01, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Virtual studio

Description of a software application called viz|. If notable, would probably require a rewrite as currently it's only a list of compoments. No external link though, so maybe not vanity. Radiant! 10:14, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Trilobite (Talk) 14:58, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. "Virtual studio" is actually a term that's gaining currency in the industry for software (or a hardware/software combo) that allows studio work to be done without everyone having to be in what we traditionally think of as a "studio." (I hope viz hasn't tried to copyright or trademark the word, and if they have, I hope the agency in charge didn't give it to them. Definitely in prior use.) Therefore, this may instead need to be rewritten. I'm not ready to do it, so maybe it should just delete for the time being. HyperZonk 17:23, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, I removed the ad and stubified it, this'll grow into something helpful. Wyss 19:39, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Agree with Wyss [[User::EggplantWizard|Eggplant Wizard] 20:15, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep with Wyss's yummy stubification. Thanks, Wyss!!! HyperZonk^talk 02:01, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, expand. A common enough software concept. Megan1967 04:47, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep the new version, well done. Radiant! 12:09, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.