Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Thomas Rich

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 03:09, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Rich

Doubtful notability, and I didn't find a reference to the school. Radiant! 14:29, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)

• Comment. The little I've found of his history doesn't seem to indicate sufficient notability, but the school can be found at [www.strs.org.uk]. If others find notability, please enrich the entry! Otherwise, let's go with Radiant! on this one. HyperZonk 19:00, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete it. Wyss 20:07, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Google has very little to say about the man himself; and what there is doesn't seem to mark him out beyond other merchants of the period. Delete. [Oops, this was me - forgot to sign. TSP 10:59, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)]
• Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 03:59, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nn. historical merchant. jni 17:50, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, seems notable. JamesBurns 09:41, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.