Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Oliver Stirling

Vanity. Delete. Lupo 15:21, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Seems Ok? Do not Delete (Vote by User:Ojms.)
This man is a god. Do not Delete (Vote by [[User:]].)
Unfortunately, neither being a god nor contributing to winamp makes one necessarily notable enough to merit an article. Delete. -- Ferkelparade π 15:45, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete: If he's a god, he sure doesn't need us. Delete for proselytizing? Delete for linkspam and vanity. Geogre 15:47, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable. — Gwalla | Talk 17:10, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
We can't delete a god, can we? Hmmmm. Let's find out. -R. fiend 17:15, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Divine Ojms, notice the polite appeal "Please do not create a page to promote yourself" anywhere? Bishonen 18:34, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Please. --Aranel 18:55, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Transwiki to Wikideity and delete, performing occult rituals as necessary to ensure article remains deleted. --Ianb 21:08, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
The man's a god? Well I'm an atheist. Delete. Average Earthman 08:56, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. The only non-notable deity I've encountered. DJ Clayworth 17:49, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete vanity page :)--Plato 20:35, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Status as deity is unverifiable and not mentioned in article. Not notable enough for inclusion if not a deity. --Michael Snow 17:19, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Vanity? Where have I heard that before? This is not vanity. Keep. And while we're at it can we cut down on the sarcasm? anthony (see warning) 21:13, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)