Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Nican Mopohua

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was transwiki then delete. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:27, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nican_Mopohua

Alleged sample of early Nahuatl: not in english thus. This should probably rather move to Wikisources. (Incidentally, I find the 9-steps VfD procedure rather long and tedious and not that easy to understand.) --FvdP 19:58, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Mikkalai 21:44, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete unless improved and notability shown. - Andre Engels 02:42, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete &#0xfeff;--fvw* 03:35, 2004 Dec 17 (UTC)
• Transwiki, needs verification. Wyss 03:52, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Concur. I believe User:Nanahuatzin reads at least some Nahuatl, I'll drop him a note. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:41, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
• Definitely not delete, but transwiki seems reasonable. It looks like Nahuatl to me, for what it's worth. - Mustafaa 15:07, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Transwiki Nanahuatzin 22:54, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)Probaly this would be better in the nahuatl wikipedia. This text is atributed to Antonio Valeriano, from the xvi century. (the text probalby was wrote 1n 1556) and is an accout of the aparition of the Virgin of Guadalupe. This would require and articule by itself but just to have a copy of the nahuatl text does not have sene.
• Actually, it would need to be on the Nahuatl Wikisource, if there is such a thing. Noel (talk) 13:45, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.