Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Naked and Petrified

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - ????

[edit] Naked and Petrified

Not notable. Just some guy who used to be a troll. Verges on fancruft. --Improv 07:09, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

• I heard about this guy on a message board, but he's not particularly notable. Delete. --Slowking Man 07:38, Sep 27, 2004 (UTC)
• Not often that a three year-old article gets nominated. Weak keep. Cool Hand Luke 08:55, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC) Redirect to Slashdot trolling phenomenon. Cool Hand Luke 09:37, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. This is an encycopedia not a trollpedia. [[User:Norm|Nor^{m]] 11:01, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Delete. Wikipedia is not Slashdot's inhouse pet record for their in-jokes and trolls. Average Earthman 13:13, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Delete. Not very notable in the big scheme of things. Thue | talk 16:51, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Delete. Why do people think anything slashdot is somehow notable? -R. fiend 17:38, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Keep. Don't see how this can be worse or less relevant than Gay Nigger Association of America. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel Image:Watchmensmiley20.gif]] 18:35, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
  • ^{Delete. If that's the best that can be said for it, enough said! Probable vanity, by a self-confessed troll. Andrewa 19:54, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
    • ^{Well, it is precedent that Slashdot trolls are notable enough to deserve at least one article. It's lame, but it's notable/famous enough to make the cut, and should be preserved, even if it's just a redirect to Slashdot#Trolling_and_moderation.[[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel Image:Watchmensmiley20.gif]] 06:38, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
      • ^{Not sure this "one bad article deserves another" mentality really works. Having this article is like having an article on each of the 40+ members of the GNAA. At least as a group they might be somewhat notable. -R. fiend 17:28, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Delete. Possibly autobiographical.Raazer 20:20, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Keep. Intrigue 21:26, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Delete, agree with R. fiend, who cares about Slashdot? -Vina 21:56, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{keep was usefull to me. This kind of cultural bit is what make wikipedia superior to paper encyclopedias.}
  • ^{Comment: That vote from IP 64.230.175.176, who has no other edits. Probably a valid comment from a reader IMO, but no change of vote. Andrewa 01:53, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Keep - its notable enough. Mark Richards 06:24, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Delete: trollvertisement. Wile E. Heresiarch 17:39, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Weak keep. Can you imagine a beowulf cluster of that?. *ahem* Kim Bruning 20:25, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Keep. Even being an RHPS fan, I never made that connection. Hope I added this vote correctly.}
• ^{Delete. Tregoweth 21:33, Sep 28, 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Keep. Rhobite 00:20, Sep 29, 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Weak keep, because wikipedia is not paper and this guy has a small amount of notability. Redirect to Slashdot trolling phenomenon as this article will probably never be expanded. —siroχo 00:52, Sep 29, 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Keep this is interesting. The Recycling Troll 03:13, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Delete Wolfman 15:35, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Delete. More unnotable troll garbage. Maybe merge somewhere or other. Jallan 16:25, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Delete. Mikkalai 04:51, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Merge and Redirect to Slashdot trolling phenomena. Doesn't deserve a separate article. Mackensen 05:09, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Does not deserve an article for itself. Delete. -- Mike Rosoft 10:56, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Delete Troll site Jongarrettuk 22:31, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{deleteGeni 17:08, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Merge with Slashdot trolling phenomenon. Alba 17:24, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)}
• ^{Merge with Slashdot trolling phenomenon. Agree with Alba here. JidGom 21:04, 2004 Oct 4 (UTC)}

^{This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.}