Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Martha Stewart Omnimedia

(and the next item, redirecting to it): substub advert. — Bill 21:23, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

IMHO a speedy deletion candidate. andy 21:34, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Expand and Keep. I know next to nothing about Martha Stewart but I've heard of this company. Possibly merge with the Martha Stewart article, but keep if possible. Darksun 21:44, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Mark Richards 22:47, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep: The copmany is noteable...if only for it's realtionship to Martha Stewart. Needs to be expanded. I'd write it if i knew anything about it. BrokenSegue 00:49, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 00:59, Oct 16, 2004 (UTC)
Rm Probably belongs better in Martha Stewart, so merge it there. Chris 01:35, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Well, it's true that an article is needed, but I believe this one should be the redirect, because the company is called Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. I don't think that a substub does us any good whatsoever, though. What are we saying? How are our readers being served by a single sentence? What benefit are we giving by preserving in edit history the first creator who thought to offer up a sentence? So, I'd rather see a delete and then listing on Requested Articles. However, it's ok if we Redirect and then Clean Up Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. Geogre 02:10, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Truly useless substub. Delete without prejudice unless expanded. anthony (see warning) 17:17, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)