Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Magical Trevor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was - merge somewhere

[edit] Magical Trevor

"Magical Trevor is a flash cartoon by Jonti Picking." So? Er, I mean, nonnotable. —tregoweth 06:03, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

• It's by the same guy who did Weebl and Bob, as a separate branch of his site known as Weebls Stuff, also known for bringing to the Internet the badger song. This movie in and of itself is not significant, but the output of quirky flashes in Weebls Stuff deserves a mention in the Weebl and Bob article. I'm not recommending a simple merge and redirect; a general mention of Weebls Stuff, including something such as "The most famous of the flashes here are Magical Trevor, Badger, etc. etc..." would be the best idea, as I see it. [[User:Mo0|Mo0[talk]]] 06:23, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Jonti Picking is the name of the guy. His entry is tiny; I suggest this entry be merged there and redirected. Incidentally didn't the same guy do those annoyingly catchy cartoon ads for butter ("incredible! edible!", etc) or something on British television this summer? --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 06:43, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Merge... with something. Doesn't deserve own article, but it is kind of notable. I mean, I've heard of it.

[maestro] 09:47, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: DCEdwards1966 14:43, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
• Redirect, or merge and redirect. Geogre 15:12, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Merge and redir. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 19:20, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Weebl is notable... and some Flash animations probably do deserve their own article... but does this one? Not sure... either keep or merge. --L33tminion | (talk) 20:06, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, do not redirect: subtrivial. Wile E. Heresiarch 20:49, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Not encyclopedic because it's not notable. --Improv 03:04, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.