Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ipaska

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 16:48, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ipaska

Company vanity with extensive external links. Less than a thousand google hits is very poor for an 'international web services company'. Not notable. Radiant! 14:02, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)

• Probably vanity. Delete unless author finds a third-party reference for verifiability - David Gerard 15:06, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertising, not noteworthy by any means --161.184.205.70 20:53, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC) updated for standard formatting and logged in --Fittysix 22:22, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Don't delete. The page should be replaced with a warning, since this man is a known scammer, and is fraudulently operating within the US.
  • unsigned comment by anon user:66.119.33.184
  • If you can demonstrate that, from citable sources, that would probably make this notable enough to keep. Otherwise, delete. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:18, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
• My first thought was to move this to user:Paska's page but I notice that this article is his/her only contribution. Delete as vanity. Rossami (talk) 06:27, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.