Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Hacked By Chinese!

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. No consensus. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 12:51, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hacked By Chinese!

Non-notable "meme". Almost every Google hit I get is describing the worm, not using this phrase in other meanings. Zoe 07:05, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to Code Red worm Halo 09:43, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect. --cesarb 17:14, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Code Red worm. Uttaddmb 19:41, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Ugh. A redirect never even occurred to me when I nominated. That would be a valid choice. Sorry. Zoe 20:22, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect Agreed. Redirect to Code Red worm. InfallibleRoxi 10:22 AM, 29 August, 2005
• Weak Keep and expand. Its in the Urban Dictionary Urban Dictionary - Hacked by Chinese content: "A phrase popularized after the Code Red worm appeared with this text in it. Basically nonsense. Code Red originated from China. Often used as an expression, much like pwned by n00bshop, except with less emphasis on the winner being neophyte-esque. - You lose. Hacked by Chinese!" end content I got 464,000 Google hits and while most are about the worm, quite a few are about the phrase.--KillerChihuahua 17:26, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Please note that UrbanDictionary is a dictionary. Wikipedia is not. Zoe 06:04, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
• Kill it. and if that doesn't work, delete. Rather useless. Redwolf24 (talk) 03:08, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, being in the urban dictionary is not notable.--nixie 03:09, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, It's all good in da hood. Gold Stur 20:27, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, This phrase, while not wildly popular, certainly has enough non-code-red-based use to warrent its own article. Nukekubi 14:00, 2005 September 1 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.