Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Genetic Pokémon

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 16:55, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Genetic Pokémon

Pokénonsense. Android79 04:55, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)

• Inarticulate pokenonsense at that! 9:58, Feb 24, 05
  • Note: Comment by user 70.176.170.245. --InShaneee 05:07, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Can we get a Speedy Delete for Patent Nonesense? I've played the game, so I can assure you, this is gibberish (pokecruft at best). --InShaneee 05:06, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, trivial, pokemon fancruft. Megan1967 06:33, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Gibberish. ComCat 09:10, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• For its horrendous grammar, it's almost BJAODN. Anyway, delete. Radiant! 11:13, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I have never played Pokémon so I can't comment on the accuracy or factualness, but it seems like poorly written fancruft. — JIP | Talk 11:23, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. 'Nuff said. -R. fiend 01:30, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, I'm familiar with Pokémon and this looks like some made-up nonsense. DopefishJustin (・∀・) 08:34, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy - any patent nonsense is wirth it to me... kelvSYC 17:57, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.