Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ethical Treatment for All Youth

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 02:39, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ethical Treatment for All Youth

Website that lists sex offenders. Radiant! 17:02, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep pending evidence of notability or lack thereof. Kappa Delete per below. 19:58, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I suppose that some may disagree with me on this, but I have a hard time considering the notability of any website that doesn't even have a domain name. C'mon, people, it's like 6 bucks a year these days. Also, less-than-stellar Google result of 395. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:53, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as it currently is now. Without some notable content, it currently looks more like a short self-promotion. Zzyzx11 23:06, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Starblind makes a good point. How notable can a website be if it doesn't even bother to register a domain? Carrp | Talk 23:10, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Promotion. Wikipedia reports on notability and notoriety; we're not supposed to try to generate it. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 23:23, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, website promo. Megan1967 23:57, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: website promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 17:02, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete--ZayZayEM 03:45, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.