Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Danebod Family Camp

Uh, wow! It's a camp... with games... and get this, crafts! It must be notable! Delete. RSpeer 04:40, Aug 30, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Notably non-notable. -- Jmabel 05:07, Aug 30, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. --Martinl 08:18, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. I'm so amazed by the non-notability of this! Saint will 11:50, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete: A camp, but a concisely written article. Geogre 12:21, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. I'm tempted to say keep, as we have plenty of articles on tiny non-notable villages, suburbs, schools etc., but there's really no information of value here. If the author can make it interesting I will change my vote, as I think Wikipedia should in general be covering topics considered non-notable by dead tree encyclopedias. — Trilobite (Talk) 02:20, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. My major concern with this type of article is that even though it may be relevant today, what will its value be in ~~ten years~~ ~~five years~~ two years from now? Does the topic of this article have sufficient staying power that it will be on anyone's radar in the short term (never mind the long term)? I think this does not cut it. Denni ☯ 02:04, 2004 Sep 1 (UTC)
Keep. What harm is it doing? It's relevant to thousands of people, which is more than can be said about many articles here. ··gracefool |☺ 04:16, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable. Andris 20:01, Sep 4, 2004 (UTC)