Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Catriona LeMay Doan/setbacks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Catriona LeMay Doan/setbacks was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 8 votes to delete. Postdlf 06:45, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Catriona LeMay Doan/setbacks

Vanity, rather bloggish and mostly nonsensical. Perhaps a speedy candidate? Fire Star 21:00, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• ...and it's an orphaned article subpage. Delete -- Ferkelparade π 22:30, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. If it made any sense, it would be as a part of the parent article. — Bill 23:26, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Incompehensible. I'm sorry she fell down. That's bad, I guess. Geogre 00:28, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Where's the question? :) Nadavspi 00:43, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonsense. jni 10:25, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Candicate for BJAODN? --Improv 14:04, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Unnecessary and spectacularly uninsightful. I second Improv's BJAODN nom, too. Bearcat 18:00, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• When did pages in the article name-space start getting subpages? Maybe someone was using this as a "sandbox"? func(talk) 22:12, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.