Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Cakeplow

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 08:37, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] cakeplow

Seems like spam, no value as encyclopedia entry, just promoting the linked sites Trisk 00:53, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete unless someone wants to completely rewrite it and show why its notable. Elfguy 01:17, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism, at best. -- DS1953 01:23, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. *drew 02:36, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Dicdef Amren ^(talk) 04:20, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete and outright nonsense-vandalism. Block the author. Paul Klenk 05:28, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Cdyson37 14:08, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Nonsense. Nothing but an attempt at blog self promotion. --Cactus.man 14:47, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - seems to be a non-famous neologism --Mysidia (talk) 16:07, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
• speedy delete nn __earth 04:50, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, just stupid. ral315 17:29, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.