Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Boba Tea Direct/Old

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.

[edit] Boba Tea Direct

Bubble tea is encyclopedic. An article on a particular supplier of bubble tea with language like "We carry the best of the best!" and "Our variety of flavors and products makes it easy for home enjoyment, adding to your existing menu, or starting a new business." and "Check out their great prices!" is not; it's advertising. Wikipedia is not a web directory; Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages. My own vote is delete. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:47, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete, very obviously advertising. Rje 00:53, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete unless Boba Tea Direct promises me a lifetime's supply of free tea. ;-) P Ingerson 01:06, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, ad. Shimeru 02:35, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Ad. utcursch 10:49, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, ad, article provides no evidence of notability. Wyss 20:26, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Dominus 04:41, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. I see no harm in keeping this. Bush Me Up 23:53, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.