Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Alejandro Puga
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus - SimonP 04:32, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Alejandro Puga
- Delete Extremely non-notable Article is Vanity Page. Article subject shows up only 159 Google Hits as Alejandro Puga Surrealist. Note: Shares common name with others. Article subject is supposed to have long history in surrealism and arts and online research shows Wikipedia article surrealist techniques as third to fourth hit. Recommend a User Page for this artist.Classicjupiter2 00:54, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:15, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 05:46, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Google for "Alejandro Puga" -Wikipedia gets 346 hits. [1]. -- Infrogmation 17:14, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Once again, many of Classicjupiter2's arguments to support this aspect of his anti-surrealist vendetta are not relevant. Restriction to Alejandra Puga Surrealist in Google search is debatable, to say the least. That he shares his name with others may mean that this should be converted into a disambiguation page if other Alejandro Pugas are notable enough for articles, but is not an argument for outright deletion. --Daniel C. Boyer 18:36, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability. No entry in the Grove Art database or any other database or journal index I searched. Gamaliel 18:59, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. Radiant! 18:17, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Valid article subject, invalid VfD nomination from sockpuppet. Notability is subjective. ~leif ☺ HELO 22:35, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep susanaeIII
-
- New account - user's first day
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
VfD tag should be removed as article survived VfD. Should not be put back unless relisted. --Daniel C. Boyer 20:10, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)