Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Age of the Spirit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Probably copyvio, religious preaching, lots of bible references. TPK 07:36, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

  • Rather incoherent, inherently POV. Delete. -- Ferkelparade π 07:53, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete - insane religious gibberings. - TB 07:57, Aug 17, 2004 (UTC)
  • religion is ok for some..............Selphie 08:01, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Either copyvio or original rambling. Delete. Average Earthman 08:49, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, incoherent and non-encyclopedic. —Stormie 10:15, Aug 17, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Part of a tract. It is not encyclopedic or NPOV. Geogre 13:55, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: anything of value here could be added instead to Holy Spirit. Smerdis of Tlön 16:03, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete or wipe and rewrite. Not in and of itself an unencyclopedic topic, but considering that this article doesn't even attempt to define it or in fact even mention it... Some of the material might be worth incorporating into other articles, if it can be established that it's not a copyvio. Aranel 16:10, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Probable copyvio: structure looks like some sort of church hand-out. Incoherent, incurably POV. — Gwalla | Talk 16:55, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Some bits might be salvageable and sent to Holy Spirit or perhaps another page or two, but most of it is crying out for deletion. -R. fiend 17:25, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • If only that much enthusiasm could be turned to the neutral side of the force... Seriously, I'm sure it is a lovely article for people who are interested in such a POV but it isn't encyclopaedic in the least. Delete. Fire Star 20:51, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Rambling. delete. Age of the Spirit is a valid theological concept, but it doesn't deserve to have this in its history. DJ Clayworth 18:12, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../v/o/t/Wikipedia%7EVotes_for_deletion_Age_of_the_Spirit_f91d.html"