User talk:Vlh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(see: block log • contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

Contents

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello {{SUBST:PAGENAME}}! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/{{SUBST:PAGENAME}}|your contributions]]. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- ~~~~
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Grand Slam Champion

Please read the discussion page before adding John Layfield to the Grand Slam Champion article. Thank you. McPhail 22:32, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McPhail 14:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

At the very least, please provide a more specific citation than "a recent episode of Smackdown." Dated phrases are not useful in an encyclopedia. Tromboneguy0186 00:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Paul Wight

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. McPhail 23:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McPhail 18:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Carmelapple 22:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. semper fi -- Moe 17:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. semper fi -- Moe 18:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
And FYI, removing the {{sprotect}} tag doesn't unprotect it. semper fi -- Moe 18:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry I blocked you. I misread the diffs and thought you were the one who said that JBL had a crush on Michelle McCool, causing a WP:LIVING based block. You should have been unblocked a while ago. Sorry. --LBMixPro <Speak|on|it!> 20:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Grand Slam Champion

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. semper fi -- Moe 00:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

WP:OR

Stop inserting original research into Wikipedia. semper fi -- Moe 22:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, but you cannot expand definitions without reliable sources or insert original research into Wikipedia. No sources indicate that the US title and IC title are interchangable and without your sources (other than a rouge comment made by JBL), we can't add it to Wikipedia. No one will dispute JBL in WWE because it wasn't a hot topic or anything important when he stated this, only to Wikipedia has it been important, and we won't continue to insert this claim without the sources. If PWI has considered the two titles equal, then please provide a source stating that they do. PWI's word, your word or JBL's word is not law here on Wikipedia, it's policy. Other Wiki users also defending your statement doesn;t make it anymore true without sources as well. semper fi -- Moe 23:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

And one more revert at all will result in an WP:3RR violation. semper fi -- Moe 23:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

And changing other pages to suit your argument doesn't make it any stronger. semper fi -- Moe 23:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Sourcing

You have been asked repeatedly for a reliable source for your edits to various wrestling articles. If you do not provide one, and continue to insert inaccurate information, you will be blocked for vandalism. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated. | Mr. Darcy talk 15:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 96 hours because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. And for future reference, coming off of one block and immediately resuming the disruptive edits that got you blocked in the first place is not a good idea. | Mr. Darcy talk 19:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to TNA Triple Crown

Your recent edit to TNA Triple Crown (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies � if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Grand Slam Champion

Are you aware of our WP:3RR rule? Please be sure you don't edit war yourself into a block. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Removal of a "protected" tag is also vandalism. Don't do that again. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked for one week as an escalation on your block time because of your repeated edit warring and repeated removing of the protected tag. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 10 days as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. You came off of one block and immediately resumed the behavior that got you blocked in the first place. I don't know how else we can make this clear to you: Original research is forbidden on Wikipedia. | Mr. Darcy talk 16:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

This is it. When this ten day block expires, if you return to edit warring again, you will be blocked indefinitely. Do you understand? User:Zoe|(talk) 16:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Please lift the block, I will adhere to Wikipedia rules.

I felt I was making a contribution, I wasn't looking for trouble.

Let's start with a clean slate.

Thank You.

Vlh 11:52 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry. You have had multiple blocks and have continued the same behavior. Take a break again. User:Zoe|(talk) 17:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


Vlh 18:12 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Your emailed requests for an unblock show that you don't even understand why you were blocked. This edit is why. You've been told repeatedly that it violates WP:OR. You weren't blocked for comments on a talk page, but for the fact that you insist on violating one of our core policies. | Mr. Darcy talk 22:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I have posted the U.S. Title/Grand Slam question to Jim Ross on his website (www.jrsbarbq.com).
  • If he answers that the U.S. Title is indeed eligible, THEN could JBL be added to the list and get me out of the doghouse?

Vlh 22:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

No, that site doesn't pass the policy on reliable sources. You need to drop this subject entirely. You're just demonstrating here that you refuse to abide by our policies and are still trying to find a way to circumvent them. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

How is a statement made by someone who is documented as being in the upper management of WWE not reliable?

With all due respect, sir, you are being quite rude and anal about this whole thing.

Vlh 23:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Your unblock request is denied. Per Zoe, if you disrupt Wikipedia again, you will be blocked indefinitely. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations! Due to this comment, your ten-day block for repeated WP:NOR violations has been bumped up to an indefinite block. | Mr. Darcy talk 01:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Unprotected

I've unprotected the page to allow Vlh to make an unblock request. He has asked me via email to unblock him, but given the history, I'm not inclined to do so. | Mr. Darcy talk 02:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "*All that went down in the past is just that...the past. *I am now ready to rejoin Wikipedia and follow all rules and regulations if given the chance to do so, knowing full well what I'm in for if I don't. *While I still disagree with some of the policies, I will accept them and follow them in good faith if I am allowed to return. *Thank You."

Decline reason: "Given the amount of vandalism that occurred just last month (December, 2006), it would not be appropriate to unblock you at this time. Generally, I tell people to wait a year without editing the Wikipedia. We may consider an unblock before that time, but certainly not this quickly given the large amount of abuse you committed. -- Yamla 23:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../v/l/h/User_talk%7EVlh_b8bf.html"