User talk:Vitalyb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello Vitalyb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 23:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Template:Satanism
I like what you've done with that! It looks great. ♠PMC♠ 01:10, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks! =) It encourages to see that people notice. I haven't yet finished too =). --Vitalyb 20:24, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
- I made the template into the red version that it was when you must have first seen it, so I keep an eye on it =) Keep up the killer work! ♠PMC♠ 07:12, 30 November 2005 (UTC) Edit - I'm not sure about the black type on black bars though, maybe change the font to scarlet or something, so that it's legible?
- I actually did like the scarlet =( I just couldn't figure out how I change the links to the same color as font (white), same way they did here, for example: Template:Heavymetal. I'll look at it some more =\. But do change to how you feel it looks better. P.S On that subject, I wish I could do some kind of CSS in tables. All this (ab)use is so 1994. --Vitalyb 00:58, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- I made the template into the red version that it was when you must have first seen it, so I keep an eye on it =) Keep up the killer work! ♠PMC♠ 07:12, 30 November 2005 (UTC) Edit - I'm not sure about the black type on black bars though, maybe change the font to scarlet or something, so that it's legible?
[edit] Fixing(?) silly colors in template:Satanism
I mean the following change: [1]
It is great you cleaned the markup but what is it about the colors? They seemed alright to me (more fitting to the theme at least). Could you elaborate? --Vitalyb
- Uhhh, what can I say - do you see the marijuana article covered with green? The hell article covered in red? All the tables of contents look the same - it's about consistency. ¦ Reisio 02:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
- No, but the Heavy metal template has red titles and it looks good. In fact, many templates have different colors do you see something especially wrong with this template being black besides? --Vitalyb 13:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
- I don't particularly care for that one, either, but only the headings have been altered, and red isn't a color that automatically makes me think "heavy metal". Making a box dark gray with BLACK headings on the Satanism article, however, smacks of embellishment and is moreover a stark contrast to the default monobook skin, decreasing readability - imho. ¦ Reisio 17:21, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
- No, but the Heavy metal template has red titles and it looks good. In fact, many templates have different colors do you see something especially wrong with this template being black besides? --Vitalyb 13:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
