Talk:Virginia Steen-McIntyre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Virginia Steen-McIntyre article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article seems in really bad shape. Sentences like "Scientists of all genres will manipulate articles of information that they deem contradicts their evidence" are POV and uncited. Also this "There is a new team working on the excavation site, as she states on her web page. Hopefully the two teams will come to the same conclusive evidence and work together on the future findings and implications of Hueyatlaco" is not really encyclopedic language. Also criticism of the dating mechanisms are not mentioned. Is anyone still working on this article? If not I will start in on it soon. Tmtoulouse 21:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)